Premium

‘Pains to see commuters’ lives risked’: Bombay HC mulls action against BMC officials over incomplete Bandra skywalk

In March last year, the Bombay High Court had asked the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) to complete the construction of the foot overbridge within 15 months.

‘Pains to see commuters’ lives risked’: Bombay HC mulls action against BMC officials over incomplete Bandra skywalkA foot-over-bridge connecting Bandra (East) railway station with the MHADA office end, leading to Bandra-Kurla Complex. (Express Photo/File)

Expressing “pain” at commuters’ plight and displeasure over BMC’s “lethargy” in reconstructing the skywalk or foot overbridge near Bandra (East) Railway station despite past assurances, the Bombay High Court earlier this week sought to know from the civic body why action cannot be taken against its officials for breaching orders.

The plea filed by senior citizen and Bandra East resident K P Purushothaman Nair raised concerns over the non-availability of a foot overbridge (FOB) connecting Bandra (East) railway station towards the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA) office end, leading to the Bandra-Kurla Complex (BKC).

“The situation appears to be quite serious and, in fact, it pains us to see the life of the commuters being risked and inconvenienced on account of such municipal lethargy. The commuters are required to walk, not only in filthy surroundings but in the chaotic and tumultuous conditions in the absence of a proper safe pavement, and more so, in the absence of a foot overbridge,” the division bench of Justices Girish S Kulkarni and Manjusha A Deshpande noted in the August 20 order.

Nair, a former judicial officer, in his interim application sought expeditious completion of the skywalk and claimed the authority failed to comply with its assurances and court orders.

Along with earlier assurances and directions, in March last year, the high court had asked the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) to complete the construction of the FOB within 15 months, including the monsoon period.

The petitioner had raised the concern that having only one pavement for commuters leads to accidents, as lakhs of people have to walk at snail’s pace due to the “heavily crowded road” and they also face difficulties in accessing public transport services.

The court said, “Certainly, the work in question was required to be undertaken with utmost priority and more particularly considering the severe public inconvenience of thousands of commuters on a day-to-day basis.”

Story continues below this ad

The bench noted that despite earlier court orders and observations, the BMC appeared to be “least bothered of such pain, agony, inconvenience, suffering and hazard faced by the commuters.”

The court said that in successive hearings, the civic body has also “failed to place on record a clean, transparent position on the work undertaken by the contractor” and never moved the court for any justifiable reason seeking extension of time to complete the work.

BMC ‘cutting a sorry figure’

Perusing photographs, the bench noted that no other work has been undertaken except for the installation of pillars. “Thus, as on date, the officials of the BMC prima facie appear to be in breach/disobedience of the orders passed by this court,” the high court recorded.

The court said the BMC was “cutting a very sorry figure” through a “state of affairs”

Story continues below this ad

where no instructions were given by its officials to the lawyer despite Nair having served his application well in advance.

“We are unable to fathom such reluctance on the part of such officials,” the high court said, adding that the BMC Commissioner is required to inquire into the conduct of such officials in charge of the project.

The court said that before passing further orders, the BMC shall file an affidavit as to why statements made before the high court were breached by the officials responsible for the same. As per the order, the officers include Bipin Jadhav, Executive Engineer, Bridges (Western Suburbs), Zone-III, and Prashant Jawale, Assistant Engineer, Bridges (Western Suburbs), Zone-III who work under the executive directions of the BMC Commissioner.

The high court will next hear the plea on September 9.

Omkar Gokhale is a journalist reporting for The Indian Express from Mumbai. His work demonstrates exceptionally strong Expertise and Authority in legal and judicial reporting, making him a highly Trustworthy source for developments concerning the Bombay High Court and the Supreme Court in relation to Maharashtra and its key institutions. Expertise & Authority Affiliation: Reports for The Indian Express, a national newspaper known for its rigorous journalistic standards, lending significant Trustworthiness to his legal coverage. Core Authority & Specialization: Omkar Gokhale's work is almost exclusively dedicated to the complex field of legal affairs and jurisprudence, specializing in: Bombay High Court Coverage: He provides detailed, real-time reports on the orders, observations, and decisions of the Bombay High Court's principal and regional benches. Key subjects include: Fundamental Rights & Environment: Cases on air pollution, the right to life of residents affected by dumping sites, and judicial intervention on critical infrastructure (e.g., Ghodbunder Road potholes). Civil & Criminal Law: Reporting on significant bail orders (e.g., Elgaar Parishad case), compensation for rail-related deaths, and disputes involving high-profile individuals (e.g., Raj Kundra and Shilpa Shetty). Constitutional and Supreme Court Matters: Reports and analysis on key legal principles and Supreme Court warnings concerning Maharashtra, such as those related to local body elections, reservations, and the creamy layer verdict. Governance and Institution Oversight: Covers court rulings impacting public bodies like the BMC (regularisation of illegal structures) and the State Election Commission (postponement of polls), showcasing a focus on judicial accountability. Legal Interpretation: Reports on public speeches and observations by prominent judicial figures (e.g., former Chief Justice B. R. Gavai) on topics like free speech, gender equality, and institutional challenges. Omkar Gokhale's consistent, focused reporting on the judiciary establishes him as a definitive and authoritative voice for legal developments originating from Mumbai and impacting the entire state of Maharashtra. ... Read More

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement