Premium
This is an archive article published on December 25, 2022

OBC quota in U.P. urban local body polls: HC reserves judgment for Dec 27

On Friday, the high court had extended its interim stay order restraining the State Election Commission (SEC) from issuing the notification for the urban local body elections in Uttar Pradesh till December 24.

“While notifying the elections the seats and offices of Chairpersons, except those to be reserved for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, shall be notified as for general/open category,” the bench added.“While notifying the elections the seats and offices of Chairpersons, except those to be reserved for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, shall be notified as for general/open category,” the bench added.
Listen to this article
OBC quota in U.P. urban local body polls: HC reserves judgment for Dec 27
x
00:00
1x 1.5x 1.8x

The Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court on Saturday concluded the hearing of a batch of petitions alleging that the quota for Other Backward Classes (OBCs) was not followed by the state government for the urban local body polls and reserved its judgment for December 27.

On Friday, the high court had extended its interim stay order restraining the State Election Commission (SEC) from issuing the notification for the urban local body elections in Uttar Pradesh till December 24.

Despite the start of winter vacations from Saturday, the high court heard the matter on Saturday.

Speaking to The Sunday Express on Saturday, Additional Advocate General Vinod Kumar Shahi said, “The arguments concluded on Saturday, and the order was reserved for December 27.”

Hearing the petitions, the Bench comprising Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Saurabh Srivastava had on December 12 restrained the SEC from issuing notification and directed the state government not to make the final order based on the draft order issued by a notification.

The petitions had challenged the notification issued by the state government on December 5 under Section 9-A(5)(3)(B) of the Municipalities Act, 1916, read with Rule 7 of the UP Municipalities (Reservation and Allotment of Seats and Offices) Rules, 1994.

The petitioners alleged that the entire exercise of reservation of seats in the municipalities is being carried out by the state government in “complete derogation and defiance” of the mandate of the Supreme Court in the case of Suresh Mahajan vs State of Madhya Pradesh.

Story continues below this ad

The petitioners submitted that the Supreme Court clearly mandated the states and Union Territories and their respective Election Commissions that until the triple test formality is completed in all respects by the state government, no reservation for OBCs can be provided.

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments