Premium
This is an archive article published on December 18, 2009

Cameron Crows

I never could understand Titanic-phobes. Those caustic,articulate people who systematically deconstructed the beautiful film I loved with all my adolescent sincerity.

I never could understand Titanic-phobes. Those caustic,articulate people who systematically deconstructed the beautiful film I loved with all my adolescent sincerity. I have only seen it once (at a matinee show in the Globe theatre),and never felt the need to revisit it,so entrenched is the love story in my mind. Fed on a steady diet of Bollywood melodramas,I was probably one of those million dufuses who made this James Cameron Film the monster hit that it was. So yes,you will never catch me running down the film.

But James Cameron’s lastest feature film,the much-anticipated Avatar has changed a few things. Most significantly,my childish preoccupation with everything shiny and spectacular.

Much like Titanic,Avatar has been made with a budget that could well support a small nation’s economy for a year (rumours have it that the budget crossed the $ 500 million mark for this one). However,disregarding the ethics of such expenditure on a film,this unprecedented extravagance guilt trips you into embracing the spectacle of Cameron’s vision— a lush alertnate universe,swathed in colours. Pandora,the verdant planet where the film is set,glitters,throbs and shines you into submission. But cracks develop pretty soon,and you wake up to what you had probably missed in Titanic. That the main problem with Cameron’s enterprise concerns characterisation and structure. A framing device in which human beings invade a luxuriant planet in search of alternate source of energy (did I mention that it is set in the year 2154),followed by an unlikely romance romance between Jake Sully (Sam Worthington),a paraplegic marine who travels to Pandora via an avatar image and an alien princess of the Na’vi tribe (Zoe Saldana),who teaches him the rules of her strange planet. A romance that entails not only a needlessly protracted build-up to the man versus alien collision,but primitive plotting and performances.

Moreover,the skimpy,soggy love story between two CGI-generated blue creatures leads to a conclusion that’s perversely uplifting: if your love’s strong,you are allwoed to betray even your own species,like Jake does when he gangs up with the Na’vians (Pfft!). That said,the effects mostly ensure pretty gripping spectacle.

Unfortunately,Avatar is awash in truncated subplots. Clearly,the otherwise unjustified and microscopic presence of Sigourney Weaver as a short-tempered scientist,is a nod to Cameron’s Aliens,where Weaver played a gritty scientist battling extra terrestrials. Indeed,the movie seems to have everything,including movie critics doing cartwheels. It even has what could pass as thematic depth,or,at least,a couple of themes. These would be the thrill and threat posed by technology,exacerbated by human delusions of grandeur and power.

Here,the man who wants to take over Pandora,played ably by Giovanni Ribisi,comes to terms with the disaster he has wrought. In a brief scene where he surveys the destruction he has caused,Ribisi recognizes that the gravity of his actions,but is too committed to the cause to back away.

This small moment might be the film’s finest: it’s succinct and relatively understated. Ribisi’s character might very well be an embodiment of the human nature to look away. Where most everything else in the movie is bizarre and outsized,this brief,absurd instant might be the point.

Story continues below this ad

The 3 D version of Avatar is running at Fame (South City) and INOX (Forum)

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement