Premium
This is an archive article published on August 21, 2024

Sign on mining file forged, Congress maligning me: Kumaraswamy on SIT’s prosecution sanction request

H D Kumaraswamy says he did not sign off on the file related to Shree Sai Venkateshwara Minerals, alleged illegalities related to which are at the centre of the mining case.

H D Kumaraswamy mining case, Karnataka Lokayukta SIT investigation, SSVM mining scandal Karnataka, Kumaraswamy forged signature claim, Union minister SSVM file controversy, prosecution sanction Kumaraswamy, Congress government Kumaraswamy allegations, SIT investigation Kumaraswamy mining case, Karnataka governor prosecution sanction, Kumaraswamy original files SSVM, international forensic experts Kumaraswamy, Rs 150-crore kickbacks Karnataka mining, Kumaraswamy SIT inquiry delay, Karnataka mining lease controversy, Kumaraswamy defends against Lokayukta probeKumaraswamy maintained he had not signed off on the file related to SSVM. (Express Archives)

In the wake of the Karnataka Lokayukta’s Special Investigation Team seeking to strengthen its case for prosecution sanction against him in a mining case involving Shree Sai Venkateshwara Minerals (SSVM), Union minister H D Kumaraswamy has said his signature in the file related to the company was forged.

Addressing a news conference on Wednesday, he accused the Congress government of trying to malign him by misusing power.

Asked by indianexpress.com as to whom he suspected of having forged the document, the Union minister for heavy industries and steel said, “How can I remember? It was 14 years ago. The SIT has to investigate that.”

Earlier, the JD(S) leader said he had all the original files related to the company.

The SIT had sought sanction for prosecution twice last year—in September and November—before Governor Thawar Chand Gehlot sought additional clarifications from the investigating agency this month. The SIT is learnt to have submitted the additional details on Monday. In its initial application, the SIT had sought the sanction, treating the minister’s signature as a key piece of evidence in the case.

Kumaraswamy maintained he had not signed off on the file related to SSVM. “It was not my handwriting (in the file),” he said and dared the SIT to approach even international forensic experts to verify it.

He said it was to be verified whether the particular file was put up before him or not. “What was the guarantee that there was no fraud here,” he asked.

Story continues below this ad

The former chief minister said he had recommended the Lokayukta inquiry after allegations of Rs 150-crore kickbacks were raised against him and that some “misconduct” in the signature in the file was found.

“There is no loss to the state exchequer. Until now, the land (550 acres for which the mining lease is sought) was not allotted to anybody,” Kumaraswamy said. According to the minister, the inquiry was instituted against him because of the interference of the previous Congress government in 2014 and 15.

In March 2017, the Supreme Court asked the investigating agency to complete the inquiry in three months. “Till now, they have not informed the court of finishing the investigation. They have only filed status reports,” he said, adding that the case was being raked up to hide the misdeeds of the Congress government.

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement