skip to content
Advertisement
Premium
This is an archive article published on December 31, 2023

Cops register FIR against Cadila CMD for rape of Bulgarian woman after Gujarat HC order

The police action has come following a recent Gujarat High Court order setting aside a magisterial court order that had rejected her complaint.

gujarat high court, cadila cmdIn October, however, the chief judicial magistrate court rejected the woman’s plea following which she moved the HC. (Express photo)

The Ahmedabad city police Sunday registered an FIR of rape and criminal intimidation against Cadila Pharmaceuticals Chairman and Managing Director (CMD) Rajiv Modi and employee Jhonson Mathew based on a complaint by a Bulgarian woman.

The police action has come following a recent Gujarat High Court order setting aside a magisterial court order that had rejected her complaint.

Confirming the registration of the FIR at Sola High Court Police Station against Modi and Mathew, Assistant Commissioner of Police H M Kansagara said, “Yes, we have registered an FIR in the case on the basis of the allegations leveled by the woman. An investigation will follow”.

Story continues below this ad

According to Sola High Court police, the duo has been charged with rape, criminal force to outrage a woman’s modesty, and criminal intimidation under the provisions of Indian Penal Code.

The complainant, who was employed as a flight attendant and a personal assistant of CMD Modi in August 2022, has alleged several instances of sexual harassment between February and March 2023. She also alleged that she was fired in April 2023 after she refused to surrender to CMD Modi’s “illicit demands”.

In July, the woman moved the magisterial court allegedly after the Ahmedabad police failed to register an FIR despite her filing a complaint. She alleged rape, criminal assault and criminal intimidation, among others, by the CMD and Matthew in her complaint before the court.

She sought directions from the magistrate’s court for immediate lodging of an FIR and action against police officers for inaction when she approached them first.

Story continues below this ad

In October, however, the chief judicial magistrate court rejected the woman’s plea following which she moved the HC.

On December 22, however, the HC set aside the magisterial court’s order and ordered investigation in the case under the provisions of Section 156 (3) of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement

You May Like

Advertisement
Advertisement