January 24, 2020 1:42 am
The state argued that given that the matter pertains to a land-related issue, the aggrieved parties must move a petition and not a PIL, which was moved by social activists.
January 23, 2020 2:28 am
A draft amendment was introduced by the petitioners on Wednesday, mentioning three recent orders issued in Ahmedabad city by police commissioner Ashish Bhatia.
January 22, 2020 5:49 am
The PIL sought to end “unlawful activities in the name of cow vigilantism” and submits to have been filed in the interest of the Dalit community, particularly on the behalf of those in villages.
January 22, 2020 1:28 am
The respondents, including the state home department secretary and the commissioner of the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation (AMC), are expected to file their reply by February 5.
January 22, 2020 12:45 am
The temporary bail had been sought for attending three weddings in his family between February 9 and 11, on the ground that two of his brothers had expired and thus, he was required at the weddings of his grandnephews.
January 18, 2020 12:20 am
After the Gaikwad Haveli police refused permission to hold the event scheduled on January 19, the organisers challenged the decision in the Gujarat High Court on Friday, following which the court issued notices.
November 22, 2019 10:35 am
Ahmedabad (Rural) Superintendent of Police R V Asari on Thursday said that the Gujarat Police will seek Nithyananda's custody through proper channels if required.
November 21, 2019 1:38 am
The petitioner has sought a writ of habeas corpus, directing the respondents to produce his daughters and sought their custody.
November 16, 2019 5:55 am
Prakash Jani’s resignation comes a week short of a decade, while admitting that the state government wanted him to continue in this position but acceded to his request to be relieved.
November 02, 2019 6:14 am
However, the division bench headed by Justice Harsha Devani observed that an affidavit-in-reply that was filed failed to mention the nature of power exercised by the DGS, Mumbai.
February 11, 2016 9:53 am
New Delhi, Feb 11 (ANI): Vrinda Grover, who is representing Ishrat Jahan’s family in court, on Thursday insisted that Ishrat had no terror links. She said that Headley’s statement is “extremely manipulative” and cannot be “treated as evidence” as per the Indian law. A judicial enquiry, the Gujarat High Court and the CBI all concluded that the encounter was fake.