skip to content
Advertisement
Premium
This is an archive article published on January 20, 2024

Gujarat HC issues notice against state, top cops in plea alleging custodial torture in Dahod last year

The petition was moved by Dahod resident Majidbhai Pipalodiya who challenged an FIR naming him and others for rioting and attempted murder and alleged that the police raid in question was fake.

guj policeThe complainant also alleged that the DSP tried to make him chant “Jai Shri Ram”, failing which another round of severe beating followed and he was made to lie on the floor. (Express file/Representational)

The Gujarat High Court on Friday issued notice to the state and its top police officials through its home department in a petition seeking the registration of an FIR against Dahod district police officers for an alleged custodial torture incident in August last year.

The petition was moved by the victim of the alleged custodial torture, Majidbhai Musabhai Pipalodiya, 49, a resident of Devgadh Baria in Dahod. An FIR was lodged at the Devgadh Baria police station on August 21, 2023, charging Pipalodiya and others for rioting and attempting to murder along with other offences. The incident allegedly involved Pipalodiya and others in a neighbourhood allegedly interfering when a police party raided a slaughterhouse on suspicion of storing beef.

However, Pipalodiya alleged that the raid was fake and the police lathicharged and opened fire during the incident in which he was not involved.

Story continues below this ad

Pipalodiya’s petition states that on August 21, 2023, Dahod police officials, including from the local crime branch, came in multiple vehicles along with “50 other people affiliated to the BJP, Bajrang Dal and Vishwa Hindu Parishad”. They allegedly surrounded the Kapdi area, picked up multiple “prominent citizens belonging to minority Muslim community” who had nothing to do with the incident, arrested and assaulted them, including “brutally beating [them] up with belts used to run flour mill”. The petitioner also accused the police of “very filthy, unparliamentary, anti-Muslim” verbal abuse.

The petitioner alleged that while in police custody, District Superintendent of Police (DSP) Rajdeepsinh Jhala had come to the police station and used “filthy abuse of the worst nature”, and he was then “made to hold rods of window and was beaten mercilessly till DSP Jhala was tired.”

The complainant also alleged that the DSP tried to make him chant “Jai Shri Ram”, failing which another round of severe beating followed and he was made to lie on the floor. “The second PSI stood on the thigh of the petitioner and he was thereafter beaten on the sole of his foot till he started bleeding profusely. Thereafter, others were called in the chamber of the PI and were beaten mercilessly,” the petition details.

The petitioner further alleged that he was taken back to Kapdi, handcuffed and paraded in Rahematnagar.

Story continues below this ad

Submitting that multiple representations to the authorities seeking registration of FIR against the erring police officials have gone unheard, Pipalodiya, represented by advocate Anand Yagnik, sought directions before the court of Justice H D Suthar.

It was submitted that the petitioner in the process of custodial torture “was robbed of his dignity and constitutional rights” and that his identity “as a distinguished Muslim leader was eroded”, and that as “the police wanted to take revenge against the Muslim Community, the petitioner was selected for all custodial violence, torture and beating.”

The petitioner thus sought the Gujarat High Court to direct the police to lodge an FIR against DSP Jhala, Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP) Bishakha Jain, Circle Police Inspector Kirit Lathiya, Devgadh Baria PSIs Devendra Solanki and one Desai, head constable Ranjitsinh Fatehsinh, police officers and personnel from the Dahod local crime branch, and others, for illegal arrest, custodial violence, torture, beating and verbal abuse against the petitioner and those arrested, and for parading the petitioner in a handcuffed condition.

The court issued notice, with the police officials expected to respond by February 8 when the court is due to take up the matter next.

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement

You May Like

Advertisement
Advertisement