May 24, 2023 11:35 pm
Verma was part of the Special Investigation Team (SIT) constituted by the Gujarat HC for investigating a 2004 incident where four persons, "including Ishrat Jahan were killed in a police firing".
May 04, 2019 5:27 am
The court arrived at this conclusion due to an absence of endorsement or note of the CBI on the government’s denial of sanction to prosecute the two former police officers.
May 03, 2019 7:37 am
A High Court-appointed special investigation team and the CBI found the Ishrat Jahan encounter to be “fake”. The CBI implicated the Gujarat Police as well as the IB in the alleged murders
April 10, 2019 12:33 am
The CBI had sought sanction for prosecution under Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure - under this section, prior sanction is required from a competent authority to prosecute a public servant.
January 01, 2019 2:09 pm
Singhal is among the key accused in Ishrat Jahan encounter case who was arrested by the CBI in 2013. He was granted default bail after the central probe agency didn't file chargesheet in the stipulated time.
August 08, 2018 5:46 am
Special judge J K Pandya rejected Vanzara and Amin’s contention that they should be discharged on the ground of parity with former DGP Pandey, who was discharged by the court in February this year.
April 28, 2018 8:37 am
The five-page reply, which opposed the discharge plea, states that the averments mentioned in paragraph 41 of Vanzara’s plea are “false, baseless and denied.”
April 27, 2018 1:35 pm
The case pertains to June, 2004, when four individuals, Ishrat Jahan, her friend Javed Sheikh alias Pranesh, Amzad Ali Rana and Zeeshan Johar were killed in an alleged fake encounter by the Ahmedabad police on the outskirts of the city.
April 13, 2018 3:13 pm
Meanwhile, a special CBI court in Ahmedabad adjourned the hearing after the probe agency sought time to respond to discharge pleas of accused former IPS DG Vanzara and former superintendent of police NK Amin in the Ishrat Jahan encounter case
November 15, 2017 1:03 am
The reply alleged that “the present respondent’s young daughter (Ishrat) was murdered following a conspiracy between high ranking police officers and others holding powerful and influential positions in the state and wielding substantial authority and clout.”



