Premium
This is an archive article published on January 11, 2010

Reported speech

It’s become a running pattern — Minister of State for External Affairs Shashi Tharoor shoots his mouth off,the Congress disapproves.

It’s become a running pattern — Minister of State for External Affairs Shashi Tharoor shoots his mouth off,the Congress disapproves. He retreats,later broadcasting some Twitter braggadocio. After recently speaking truth to power over the visa issue (forcing senior minister S.M. Krishna to intervene),Tharoor now appears to have picked on the biggest “holy cows” possible — Gandhi and Nehru,and the contentious afterlife of Nehru’s ideas.

Speaking after (and summing up) Bhikhu Parekh’s lecture on ‘India’s Place in the World’,he lauded Nehru’s extraordinary “articulation of our civilisational heritage”,but also acknowledged how this often amounted to a “moralistic running commentary”. An outraged Congress party shot back saying “his responsibility is to carry forward the legacy of Pandit Nehru and not be critical of it”. Tharoor chose offence as defence,blaming “inaccurate and tendentious reporting” for the misunderstanding,and clarifying that he was at one with the profound convictions of the Congress.

Tharoor could have a point — plucking his words out of context and placing quotation marks around words he did not utter would manifestly be terrible journalism — though his manner was unbecoming. However,the larger point remains that the mainstream media (MSM) Tharoor loves to hate did not create this constant tension between him and his party. He is possibly yet untrained in the intricate ways of political communication,and unaware of the weight of his own words as a minister. As his fondness for Twitter demonstrates,he is all about unmediated conversation — and the direct,natural,and shoot-from-the-hip speaking voice. Meanwhile,the crusty old Congress party is still used to the monotone of the press release,the platitudes of official spokespersons. At a deeper level,a party that has shape-shifted without actually discussing its icons,without having an internal debate over their legacy,is bound to be fearful of freethinking voices,anxious to impose consensus. Tharoor simply needs to decide whether he wants to be the glib crusader for social media or a responsible junior minister in external affairs and a politician headed for bigger things in the party he’s found himself in. Talking down to the media in pompous outrage will,however,get him nowhere.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement