Premium
This is an archive article published on February 16, 2016

SC upholds Army promotion policy, orders more posts

According to SC ruling, officers commissioned into the Army in a given batch cannot expect that the government will maintain batch parity for promotion among officers of Arms, Arms Support and Services.

indian army, supreme court, defence ministry, sc army promotion policy, supreme court army promotion, india news, latest news Supreme Court of India

Praising the government’s attempt to lower the age of senior Army officers in combat and combat support cadres, the Supreme Court Monday upheld the 2009 Command Exit Policy that will create more than 1600 vacancies in the rank of Colonel “to render the Indian Army more efficient and better equipped for combat situations”.

A bench of Chief Justice TS Thakur and Justice Kurian Joseph held that the policy, which has a “laudable” object, cannot be struck down on the ground of being perverse, unreasonable or unfair.The Supreme Court also directed the Defence Ministry to create 141 additional posts of Colonel to be allocated to ‘Combat Support’ stream — engineers, signals, artillery air defence — for being utilised by officers who were eligible for promotions against the same from 2009 and till 2014. The court, however, refused to give the same relief to officers from services — Army Service Corps, Army Ordnance Corps and other minor corps — as that had not been recommended by the AV Singh Committee formed by the government.

The Armed Forces Tribunal had last year quashed the promotion policy after holding that it violated right to equality by prescribing preferential promotions to officers from select arms – Armoured Corps, Infantry, Mechanised Infantry in the Combat Arms cadre. The tribunal had also held that the promotion policy was unfair since it trampled upon the legitimate expectation of the officers serving in other cadres such as a Combat Arms Support and Service.

Story continues below this ad

On Monday, the top court set aside that order and clarified that the officers in service streams did not constitute a single cadre. The Army, the court said, has three major streams which are a separate cadre: Arms like infantry, armoured corps and mechanised infantry; Arms Support like artillery, engineers, air defence and signals; and Services like Army Service Corps and Army Ordinance Corps. This means that officers commissioned into the Army in a given batch cannot expect that the government will maintain batch parity for promotion among officers of Arms, Arms Support and Services.

About the Arms Support stream, the apex court took note of a submission by Additional Solicitor General Maninder Singh that the government was willing to create 141 additional vacancies to accommodate these officers to prevent any disenchantment among those serving in the Army. Describing the government’s stand as “heartening”, the court upheld the policy while directing the government to create 141 more positions.

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement