Premium
This is an archive article published on August 11, 2013

Australian candidate quits election race after confusing Islam for country

Also confuses the word 'Halal' with Koran,apologises for embarrassment.

Stephanie Banister,a candidate from an anti-immigration party in Australia,who was widely mocked after she mistook Islam for a country in a TV interview,has apologised and quit the election race.

Stephanie Banister,27,of One Nation Party was contesting a seat in Queensland. She had only been in politics for 48 hours.

Banister also confused the term ‘haram’ (forbidden) with the Koran and suggested Jews worshipped Jesus Christ.

Story continues below this ad

The interview,which aired early on Wednesday,went viral on social media.

“I don’t oppose Islam as a country,but I do feel that their laws should not be welcome here in Australia”,Banister told Seven News.

She announced her withdrawal from the September 7 national election yesterday.

“With the way Channel Seven edited my interview,I was left quite the fool”,Banister said in a brief statement.

Story continues below this ad

“I’d like to apologise to One Nation,to my friends and family,for any embarrassment this has brought to them”.

The leader of One Nation,Jim Savage,said Banister continued to have the “full support” of the party executive. He said she had been under “enormous pressure”,including threats to her and her family.

One Nation spokesman Rod Evans said Banister “knows very well” that Islam is not a country but simply misspoke.

Banister denied that she was unprepared to fight a federal election but admitted she was “possibly inexperienced” and “still learning about the politics side of life”,Sydney Morning Herald reported.

Story continues below this ad

Commentators compared Banister to Sarah Palin,the gaffe-prone Republican vice-presidential candidate in the 2008 US election.

The mother-of-two rose to prominence when she was arrested for going into a supermarket and putting stickers saying “halal food funds terrorism” on Nestle products.

She is facing charges of ‘contaminating or interfering with goods’. If convicted before polling day,she would have been barred from standing.

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement