Opinion The Third Edit: Individual stories in an era of data overload

In an era of digital immediacy and data overload, is there still room for the memoir that zooms in on the personal over the big picture? The publication of a spate of memoirs, from Kargil War hero Lt Gen Y K Joshi’s Who Dares Wins to Amol Palekar’s Viewfinder to the English translation of a Finnish woman’s account of life in the Soviet Union under Stalin in the 1930s, Under the Sickle and the Sledgehammer paints a reassuring picture of their enduring appeal and historical heft.

From General Joshi’s retelling of his life as a soldier to Kirsti Huurre’s account of the dissolution of her dream of egalitarianism in Under the Sickle and the Sledgehammer, each of these books shows that history is not something that happens to nations. It seeps into the lives of individuals, beyond the grandiose narratives of history books or official state records. Memoirs humanise momentous events, the lived experiences of people providing the texture and depth to the complexities of an era.

Advertisement

As the world celebrated the 80th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz this week, for instance, it was the diary of a 13-year-old Anne Frank, hidden in a secret annexe in Amsterdam during the Holocaust, that offered a glimpse into the human cost of war when it was first published posthumously in 1947. Frank had perished in the Bergen-Belsen concentration camp in 1945.

In 2007, on a visit to New Delhi to release the English translation of his memoir Once Upon a Time in the Soviet Union, Dominique Lapierre had spoken of his experience of travelling through post-Stalin USSR. One of the highlights of the trip was meeting an old Soviet lady who requested Lapierre to deflate one of the tires of his French Marly so she could “feel the gust of air from Paris”, he told The Indian Express. History books can speak of how the world changes one event at a time, but only such intimate accounts can speak of what it feels like to live through them.