Love Jihad
The editorial in the latest issue of RSS mouthpiece Organiser,titled Take action against love jihad, says: What is the lure of Love Jihad? The problem is old. But the terminology is new,crediting its origins to some imaginative police officer in Kerala,who filed his affidavit in the high court following a widespread commotion against an alleged sinister campaign by Kerala Islamists to convert non-Muslim women to Islam through deceptive love and marriage. Such cases have become commonplace in North India and the readers of Organiser are familiar with them,as such cases have been written about in the journal. The problem received wider attention in Kerala because the Christian girls are equal victims of the jihadi Romeos as the Hindus,and the church has taken a serious view. The Commission for Social Harmony and Vigilance of the Kerala Catholic Bishops Council,which is actively creating public opinion against the organised menace of Love Jihad,says that women so converted to Islam are being used by male Islamist terrorists.
It adds: …A concerned Kerala High Court ordered the state director general of police and the Union home department last month to file their reports on the matter after a thorough probe. Last week,the Kerala DGP Jacob Punnose filed a reply,which he later termed interim,in which he denied the presence of any organised campaign or outfit named Love Jihad. Experts termed his report politically dictated and funny because of its timing and contradictory observations. The Kerala-ruling Left Front,facing three by-elections on November 7,tried to woo the fanatic Muslims by presenting such a reply in the court. However,it backfired. The reply admitted that Muslim men had been trying to convert women to Islam through love marriages. Such Muslim youth could be getting external financial assistance for expensive clothes,motorbikes and money to attract girls,it said. The DGPs reply further revealed that these young men could be getting legal assistance for staying out of danger from police and public. Irked by the contradictions in the reply,the high court ordered the DGP to file a fresh report.
Global inequality
In an opinion piece titled Policy for reducing global inequality Bharat Jhunjhunwala writes: Developing countries have to choose between two policies for reducing global inequality. One policy is of cooperation. Developing countries can hope for an increase in the growth rates of the developed countries. An increase in consumption by these countries will create demand for their exports just as the ancillary industry gains when sales of the parent company pick up; or as the village potter gains when the landlord reaps a good crop. The most efficient among the developing countries will gain more from such exports. The second policy is that of confrontation. Developed countries are importing the natural resources of the developing countries such as iron ore,oil rice and mangoes in large quantities. Developing countries can make cartels and jack up the prices of these exports just as was done by the oil-exporting countries in 1971 by forming OPEC.
He concludes: The world economy can be divided into four parts. At the lowest rung are the poorest countries like Bangladesh. At the second level are developing countries like India. At the third level are middle income countries like Brazil and Hungary. At the top are the developed countries like the United States. We have to discover the main fault line among these divisions. The main problem of the world economy in my reckoning is the high consumption by the developed countries. Therefore,ideally,the lower three rungs should make a common cause and join hands against the developed countries.