Opinion Dear Editor, I Disagree: Maharashtra’s ‘Urban Naxal’ law is not aimed at silencing dissent

One of the critical shortcomings of the existing framework is its inability to effectively address the root causes of Naxalism. The Naxal movement thrives on socio-economic grievances such as poverty, lack of education, and unemployment. These must be tackled alongside stringent security measures. Recognising this, the Maharashtra government has taken affirmative steps to generate employment opportunities and improve basic infrastructure in Naxal-prone areas. For instance, the recent laying of the foundation stone for a second steel unit in Gadchiroli, with an investment of Rs 10,000 crore, is a testament to the government’s commitment to fostering economic development in these regions. This project is expected to create much-needed employment opportunities and address the socio-economic disparities that fuel Naxalism.

Moreover, the individuals leading the Naxal movement do not believe in the rule of law, and certain vested organisations continuously incite unrest. The Bill is designed to address the dual challenges of physical violence and ideological support that perpetuate the Naxal insurgency.

It is also crucial to acknowledge that Naxalism is not confined to remote rural areas. Urban areas are increasingly becoming breeding grounds for Naxal frontal organisations, which provide logistical support and safe havens for armed cadres. The spread of these active frontal organisations underscores the need for legislation that can address urban Naxalism as well. This Bill encompasses provisions to curb the activities of these urban Naxal fronts, ensuring a comprehensive approach to combatting the movement.

The current laws have been ineffective and inadequate, as evidenced by the spread of violent Naxal activities. The new Bill will grant the government and police machinery powers to combat unlawful activities more effectively. Specifically, the bill states that “any action which constitutes a danger or menace to public order, peace, and tranquility or interferes or tends to interfere with the maintenance of public order or interferes or tends to interfere with the administration of law or its established institutions and personnel will be considered an unlawful activity”. This provision is essential to ensure that law enforcement agencies have the necessary tools to maintain public order and safeguard citizens’ rights.

Your editorial suggests that the new law strikes at dissent. However, it is important to differentiate between legitimate dissent and activities that endanger public order and safety. The Maharashtra government’s approach is not about suppressing dissent but about ensuring that the state does not remain hostage to individuals and groups that engage in violence and undermine the rule of law. The Maharashtra Special Public Security Bill, 2024, complements efforts to generate employment and improve infrastructure, addressing both the symptoms and the root causes of Naxalism.

In conclusion, while the UAPA provides a broad framework for addressing unlawful activities, the specific and persistent threat posed by Naxalism in Maharashtra requires a more focussed and robust legislative approach. This Bill is a necessary step towards ensuring public safety, fostering development, and upholding the rule of law. By simultaneously addressing socio-economic grievances and enhancing security measures, the Maharashtra government is working towards a holistic solution to the Naxal problem.

I urge your readers to consider the comprehensive strategy being implemented, which includes both the new legislative measures and significant developmental initiatives. It is through this dual approach that Maharashtra can hope to eradicate the scourge of Naxalism and secure a peaceful and prosperous future for all its citizens.

The writer is vice president, Mumbai BJP and managing partner, Parinam Law Associates