Tags:
Journalism of Courage
More or less everyone with an interest in nuclear policy welcomed Saturday8217;s meeting between the prime minister and nuclear scientists. There was much bonhomie; the scientists complimented the PM for his 8220;beautiful8221; parliamentary statement and the PMO8217;s statement was brimming with the optimism that these VIP interlocutors have been convinced. Sorry to spoil the party but not all was well with the meeting. It set a sort of a precedent that can be referred to again and again when executive policy decisions draw loud opposition, as indeed they will in a robust democracy.
Hosting a group of retired government scientists who appealed to Parliament against the government8217;s policy may look like mature and gentlemanly. In real fact it is giving up on a fundamental working principle of Indian democracy 8211; the executive draws its powers from majority support in Parliament, American-style legislature-executive separation of powers doesn8217;t exist. The scientists, who were employed by the government once and were drawing upon that career profile, had no business talking to Parliament directly. They deserved to be reminded of that enormously serious lapse. It doesn8217;t seem that was done at Saturday8217;s meeting. On the contrary, they seemed to have been invited to offer their wisdom as the nuclear negotiations proceed. The DAE chief and the national security advisor are to act as liaison men. Surely, there8217;s something wrong if two of the government8217;s most key officials are asked to obtain de facto clearances from retired government servants?
