Although the Election Commission has acted in a most fair manner, the Lucknow stampede is a stark reminder that everything is not well in our society. India’s population is growing rapidly and job opportunities are shrinking. Make-belief poll slogans are fine for publicity, but if we continue to fool ourselves with the illusion of India Shining, we may soon enter a time zone when much less than a Rs 40-sari will be incentive enough for the poor to risk lives.
What is even more pathetic is the fact that people started passing the buck right over the dead bodies. From what I could gather, the event, organised by a BJP leader known for his proximity to Lalji Tandon, was widely publicised by dangling the free-sari bait. But the organisers arranged for fewer saris than promised. So, when over 10,000 women and children gathered, the organisers started throwing the saris in the crowd.
Surprisingly, without even attempting to ascertain the facts, UP Chief Minister Mulayam Singh Yadav dismissively said ‘‘these things do happen’’. No wonder Lalji immediately praised Mulayam’s magnanimity. Since the organiser is a Yadav, and the BJP’s electoral prospects are at stake, the entire State Government machinery went out of its way to hush up the tragedy. While the nation is aghast, Mulayam and Lalji are trying their best to protect the guilty. And they still want us to take their claim of no under-the-table BJP-SP understanding seriously.
But Lalji must answer a few questions. The lame excuse of birthday celebrations apart, he must explain why he organised an event to bribe voters in complete violation of the model code of conduct? Second, he must explain why the organisers indulged in mass publicity, ensuring a huge turnout, without providing for sufficient stocks of saris? Lalji should not forget how the late Indira Gandhi’s election was set aside because her private secretary used an official vehicle.
Let CVC Decide
Remember the Vineet Narain case when the SC held that the Single Directive of the Government, stipulating that the CBI should take prior government approval before probing any officer of the level of Joint Secretary and above under the Prevention of Corruption Act, was not sustainable in law?
Due to the legal fallacy that no government servant can take a decision that benefits private parties, and the grey area between public and private parties, many government officers avoided crucial decisions lest they came under the CBI scrutiny. This meant passing files, delaying policy implementation.
Now, with the Parliament approving the CVC Bill with a clause giving legal status to the Single Directive, we have a conflicting situation when an executive decision tends to override a legal provision. To find a logical solution, there has been a suggestion to give the CVC the power to set up advisory boards to scan complaints before advising the CBI on further proceedings.
After all, which institution is better suited to assist the CBI than the CVC. And in CVC P. Shankar, we have a brilliant mind complemented by a practical approach. He is ably supported by the two Commissioners — H.J. Dora and Janki Ballabh.
Hits and Flops
There has been a rush among filmstars to join mainstream politics in the run-up to the polls. However, there are few serious contenders among them. Heading this list is Hero No 1 Govinda, pitted against BJP’s Ram Naik, the five-time MP from Northwest Mumbai.
Recently, I campaigned for a day with Govinda. I was amazed to see the kind of response he was getting. If it translates into votes, Govinda will surely win. Moreover, there is the anti-incumbency factor against Naik.
Even Sholay’s Viru (Dharmendra) is drawing huge crowds in Bikaner. There is a high probability that he may make it to Parliament. Moushumi Chatterjee is putting up a good show in Kolkata as well.
The writer is a Congress member of the Rajya Sabha