There are broadly three ways in which,economists would argue,the Obama administration is failing to defend the most basic principles on which the consensus towards globalisation has been built. All three were on display this week,as the final drafts of the giant stimulus bill worked their way through the United States labyrinthine and inefficient political process. What is emerging is still protectionist in effect and
intent; but,as the WTOs secretary-general Pascal Lamy was forced to point out on Monday,does not directly violate trade rules.
And,finally,the third principle is that of an investment in multilateralism over bilateralism. That is precisely what has been jettisoned,even in the face-saving compromise version of the stimulus that Lamy damned with faint praise. That version includes the requirement that no bilateral pacts,with Canada or Europe,for example,be violated; but that will not stop it from hurting vast,vulnerable stretches of the emerging world as well as further stalling international trade talks. It does that by increasing the urgency for individual countries to come to some agreement,however unequal and retrogressive,with the US instead of sitting down and hammering out broad international agreement. On each of these counts,the USs support,explicit and implicit,for protectionism is deeply disturbing.