It is the eve of parliamentary elections on October 10th and Kyrgyzstan is in campaign mode. So many posters and party flags have been nailed to trees in Bishkek that environmentalists,fearing for the plants health,have started to remove them and replace them with ribbons.
With more than 3,300 candidates from 29 parties competing for just 120 parliamentary seats,Kyrgyzstan is far from the regions authoritarian norm. Television viewers are inundated by party advertisements every few minutes and news broadcasts report the main rallies of the day. Central Asia has never seen such a competitive race,says Edil Baisalov,who heads the Aikol El Magnanimous People party. If it werent for those bloody events,this would be a time to celebrate, he sighs.
But the election may disappoint those hoping for a new start. An anxious and sombre mood prevails,reflected in party slogans such as Fear or Security? Choose! or Unity,Stability,Security. The elite seems unlikely to change. Feliks Kulov,a former prime minister and leader of the Ar-Namys Dignity party,for example,is said to have a good chance of getting into parliament,along with five or six other parties. He is ethnically Kyrgyz with a reputation as a law-and-order man,who appeals to the ethnic Uzbek and ethnic Russians as well as to the urban Kyrgyz.
The Uzbeks,who are the second-largest ethnic group with 14.5 per cent of the population compared with almost 70 per cent for the ethnic Kyrgyz,feel vulnerable. According to a recent Human Rights Watch report,some government forces,knowingly or unwittingly,encouraged attacks on Uzbek neighbourhoods in June. Widespread violations have taken place during the authorities investigation into the violence,which took place around the cities of Osh and Jalal-Abad,mostly populated by Uzbeks.
Though some of the parties go out of their way to present people of different ethnicities in their advertisements,relations between Uzbeks and Kyrgyz remain tense. We are surviving on good luck at the moment, says Paul Quinn-Judge of the International Crisis Group,an NGO. He fears that Ms Otunbayeva has not taken enough advantage of the current lull to forestall future violence.
Whatever the election result,it will take time for trust to be rebuilt. Reconciliation needs a new government and parliament,not a caretaker government,says one diplomat. Nobody knows whether parties that fail to pass the dual thresholds of 5 per cent nationally and 0.5 per cent regionally will accept the results. We are all going about our daily business as usual,but no one is planning 2-3 months ahead, says Dinara Oshurahunova,executive director of the Coalition for Democracy and Civil Society. Everyone is waiting for election day.
The Economist Newspaper Limited 2010