Premium
This is an archive article published on October 23, 2005

The textile town’s torn fabric

TILL October 15 Mau was a small textile town in eastern Uttar Pradesh where the path of its Muslim and Hindu populations crossed frequently....

.

TILL October 15 Mau was a small textile town in eastern Uttar Pradesh where the path of its Muslim and Hindu populations crossed frequently. Mixed neighbourhoods were the norm. The business interests of the two communities were linked. The powerlooms—there are a lakh of them in Mau district—are owned by the Muslims who make up 70 per cent of the town’s population whereas Hindus who also run cloth shops, supply them with threads and yarn.

Then the events of a single day changed Mau forever. And ironically it was Mau’s secular custom that became its undoing.

For years Mau followed this tradition: Hindus would knock the hand-drawn rath of their idol three times against the gate of the Shahi Katra mosque on the busy Kotwali-to-Chowk Road during Bharat Milap, while the Muslims would climb three steps of a neighbouring Sanskrit pathshala during Moharram.

Story continues below this ad

On October 14 the custom was about to repeat itself when trouble began. Muslims attending Ramzan prayers asked the Ramlila organisers to switch off their loudspeakers. An argument broke out which got increasingly graver. The next day it worsened when Ajeet Singh Chandel, district president of Hindu Yuva Vahini, opened fire from a terrace. Then entered Mukhtar Ansari, an independent MLA from Mau, who drove around town in an open Gypsy with his cronies, armed with rifles and revolvers.

The riots on October 15 left nine dead and many injured. Skirmishes during festivals are not unheard of in Mau but never before has a riot like this taken place. And for the first time there is real fear that the scars could be permanent and could break off the once strong socio-economic bond between the two communities.

There have been conflicting reports on the nature and extent of Ansari’s involvement in the riots, but there is no denying that his presence did encourage trouble-makers. Mukhtar’s arch rival from the Samajwadi Party, Arshad Jamal who is the Mau Nagar Palika chairman is quite charitable. ‘‘His presence may have given a wrong signal, but it is wrong to say that he engineered it all.’’

To make his point he says had that been the case, the devastation at Ali Nagar would not have happened. ‘‘The media has not gone to Ali Nagar, the administration has not. Actually, the damage has been borne by both communities,’’ says Jamal.

Mukhtar Ansari’s bluster may have led many to imagine that only one community suffered. But a visit to Ali Nagar, the deserted 80-house colony of poor powerloom workers, shows just how wrong that perception is.

Story continues below this ad

About a kilometre and a half away is a Hindu locality at Bada Pokhra. Its damaged homes speak of the same violence. Ali Nagar and Bada Pokhra are two chapters of the same desolate story.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement