The glass is both half-empty and half-full. India’s hockey team came fourth in the Champions Trophy after being written off before the meet started. That’s good, you might think, till you pause to consider that, but for a horrific lapse of concentration, it might have been a bronze. That’s the curious fallout of this tournament for India: there’s some good news, and some bad. Manish Kumar writes. PC UPGRADE Long a national achilles heel, the Indians showed a novel deftness and confidence in taking, and converting, penalty corners. The problem used to be a lack of variety; if the drag-flick went wrong the hitter was put to work; if both failed then divine intervention was sought. Cologne was a refreshing change: the team came with almost half a dozen variations, the precise execution of which was a revelation. One could almost see the Indians putting on their thinking caps every time a strategy didn’t quite click. They changed tack, and fast: if drag-flicker Jugraj Singh failed to find the net with his scoop, hitter Dilip Tirkey was brought on, but with a clever mix of the variations. MIDFIELD MARSHALS Fast forward: The faces of the futureEveryone knows about Prabhjot, Gagan Ajit and Deepak Thakur. They’re veterans at 22. But watch out for these three: they’re primed for take-off.IGNACE TIRKEY: The most effective player in the fledging midfield, he turned a potential disadvantage into a springboard for some of the fast and furious attacks. Showed a mature head by shouldering the extra load. Tirkey’s brother, Prabodh, was also among the probables for the Champions Trophy but Ignace got selected and made his presence felt in the midfield. Tirkey has already shown signs of being an attacking midifelder, a good sign for Indian hockeyMan-management has always been a problem in Indian hockey and was so again. For one, the traditional regional groupism came to the fore. India’s victory over Pakistan in the league did more harm than good at one level, with some disaffection in the team over Dhanraj hitting the limelight. Indeed, the play-off match saw Dhanraj get very little of the ball, and there was much talk afterwards on how some players deliberately kept the ball from him. There were certain moves by the Indian think-tank which also defied logic. Viren Rasquinha, one of the finds of the tournament, had to warm the bench for no reason in the bronze playoff while an offcolour Daljit Singh Dhillon and Tejbir Singh played for much of the second half. Ironically, the huge defensive holes then would have been meat and drink to Viren.What a choke! It’s another matter that Devesh Chauhan shone, but having two inexperienced goalkeepers in the squad speaks volumes about the planning that goes on in the IHF. It was the same story in the midfield, the most critical area but the most neglected in the Indian context. Also, there were too many passengers in the Indian squad and team manager Aslam Sher Khan admitted that lack of bench strength was a major problem. Speaking of manager, Khan — a popular official in Cologne — won’t be with the team for the Asian Games. Elsewhere, such top posts are held for periods of around 3-4 years but Khan held his for this one tournament. And don’t even get us started on the coaches.