145;Temple trace beneath Babri146;

The Archaeological Survey of India has claimed that there is evidence 8216;8216;indicative8217;8217; of remains associated with 8216;...

The Archaeological Survey of India has claimed that there is evidence 8216;8216;indicative8217;8217; of remains associated with 8216;8216;temples of North India8217;8217; at the Babri Masjid site from the 10th Century AD, predating the mosque by at least 500 years.

The ASI8217;s report was submitted8212;after six months of excavation8212;in the Lucknow special bench of the Allahabad High Court hearing the title suits. While the Sangh Parivar cheered the findings today, the All India Muslim Personal Law Board called the report8217;s conclusion 8216;8216;vague, unsubstantiated8217;8217; and said it would file its objections within the stipulated six-week deadline.

Covering a sweep of seven periods since 1000 BC, the ASI says that its conclusion is based on 8216;8216;archaeological evidence of massive structure just below the disputed structure Babri Masjid and evidence of continuity in structural phases from the 10th Century onwards up to the construction of the disputed structure8230;8217;8217; This 8216;8216;massive structure,8217;8217; the ASI claims is one with 8216;8216;stone and decorated bricks as well as mutilated sculpture of divine couple and carved architectural members including foliage patterns8230;doorjamb with semi-circular pilaster, broken octagonal shaft of black schist pillar, lotus motif, circular shrine having pranala waterchute in the north, fifty pillar bases8230;8217;8217;

Incidentally, this summer five historians, including Suraj Bhan, had said that this structure below the Babri was a mosque.

Contacted today, Bhan said: 8216;8216;What the ASI calls evidence of a temple like pillar bases could belong to the period after Babri Masjid. The massive structure is a Sultanate period mosque.8217;8217;

The ASI excavation covers seven 8216;8216;periods8217;8217; starting from 1000 BC till the Medieval-Sultanate period which is 12th AD-16th AD. The ASI based its survey on the report of Ground Penetrating Radar Survey which mentioned 8216;8216;anomalies8217;8217; at the site.

The ASI dug a few more trenches to complete its excavations.

According to a summary of its findings:

Story continues below this ad

8226; The study began at the deepest level of the dig belonging to 1000 BC to 300 BC, confirmed after Carbon-14 dating. At this level, the ASI found 8216;8216;no structural activity8217;8217; but discovered 8216;8216;terracotta figurines of female deities showing archaic features8217;8217; and Northern Black Polished Ware, typical of the period.

8226; The next level, Period II of Sunga horizon, 2nd century BC to 1st century BC, yielded terracotta mother goddesses and elementary construction, the ASI claimed.

8226; Period III belonged to the Kushan period, 1st century AD to 3rd century AD: 8216;8216;large-sized structures,8217;8217; the report states.

8226; Period IV, the Gupta period, from 4th century AD to 6th century AD 8216;8216;did not bring any change in building activity,8217;8217; the ASI found.

Story continues below this ad

8226; Period V, the post-Gupta-Rajput period from 7th Century A.D. to 10th century AD: 8216;8216;Among the exposed structures, there stands a circular brick shrine which speaks of its functional utility for the first time8230;Though the structure is damaged, the northern wall still retains a provision for pranala waterchute which is a distinct feature of contemporary temples already known from the Ganga-Yamuna plain.8217;8217;

8226; Period VI, early medieval period, 11th century AD to 12th century AD: 8216;8216;A huge structure, nearly 50 metre in North-South orientation8230;which seems to have been short-lived8230;On its remains was constructed a massive structure with at least three structural phases and three successive floors attached with it,8217;8217; the report states adding that this was 8216;8216;different from residential structures8217;8217; and remained in existence even during the next period.

8226; Period VII: 8216;8216;It was on top of this construction during the early 16th Century A.D., the disputed structure Babri Masjid was constructed directly resting over it,8217;8217; the ASI report states.

8216;8216;The centre of the central chamber of the disputed structure falls just over the central point of the length of the massive wall of the preceding period which could not be excavated due to presence of Ram Lala at the spot in the make-shift structure,8217;8217; the report notes.

Story continues below this ad

Terracotta lamps were found at this level, the ASI claims, and evidence to 8216;8216;signify the place where some important object was placed.8217;8217;