Premium
This is an archive article published on May 2, 2000

Take interest of public in view in land acquisition cases — HC

PUNE, MAY 1: The Bombay High Court has said that courts should consider the larger public interest while hearing petitions which challenge...

.

PUNE, MAY 1: The Bombay High Court has said that courts should consider the larger public interest while hearing petitions which challenge land acquisition proceedings. It made this important observation while dismissing the writ petition filed by Pune-based shopkeepers challenging the Pune Municipal Corporation’s action of acquiring their land to widen the congested Bajirao and Laxmi road.

Whatever may have been the practices in the past, a time has come where the courts have to weigh the public interest vis-a-vis private interest while exercising the power under Article 226, Justice A V Savant and Justice S S Parkar of the Bombay High Court observed.

The petition had been filed by Kantilal Mohanlal Shah and others challenging the award dated April 18, 1998, passed under the Land Acquisition Act for widening a road in a congested part of the city — at the intersection of Laxmi Road and Bajirao Road in Narayan Peth. The PMC had served notices to shopkeepers located at the property of Huzurpaga school on Laxmi Road.

Story continues below this ad

With the Bombay High Court dismissing the petition, the PMC will initiate the land acquisition proceedings within two days. While giving the order, the court made a few observations related to land acquisition proceedings. It said India had launched an ambitious programme of all round advancement to make the economy competitive in the world market.

The infrastructure for sustaining such a pace is woefully lacking. The means of transportation, power and communications are in dire need of substantial improvement. These things very often call for acquisition of land and that too, without delay. It is, however, natural that affected persons challenge the acquisition proceedings in courts. In the matter of land acquisition for public purposes, the interests of justice and public interest should coalesce.

In fact, it may be even open to the High Court to direct that affected people be entitled to a particular amount of damages if the court finds that the acquisition was vitiated on account of non compliance with some legal requirement, the court observed.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement