Tags:
Journalism of Courage
When nine out of 10 diversified equity funds underperform the Sensex, as this newspaper8217;s study on Monday shows, it8217;s time to ask questions. First, the stock market benchmark is just that, a yardstick to measure the performance of India8217;s most valuable, most sought after companies. An equity mutual fund is expected to do better. So what happened? Second, the performance of funds across six timeframes from one week to one year indicates a sharp and consistent performance lag. Why? Third, could it be that in a bid to outperform the benchmark which, incidentally, could be other indices like Nifty, BSE 100 and so on, fund managers extended themselves into territories they shouldn8217;t have been in 8212; small caps, for instance?
We all understand that funds can, and do, underperform. But when 75-96 of them fail to match the market, it8217;s time for trustees of funds to ask the AMCs they8217;ve outsourced investment management to, just what8217;s going on. The other issue the trustees must raise, and which Sebi chief M. Damodaran hopes to get them to raise, with their AMCs is one of intermediaries. With commissions being the first, second and last objective, the past two years saw intermediaries arm-twist the industry into launching new schemes and getting their clients, us investors, to needlessly churn their money from one to the other. Of course, that has ended after Sebi changed amortisation norms for open-ended funds, but questions about mis-selling and short-duration closed-end funds being launched remain and need close monitoring.
