Premium
This is an archive article published on April 9, 2004

SC upholds Constitutional validity of Securitisation Act

The Supreme Court today upheld the constitutional validity of the Securtisation Act empowering the financial institutions to attach and sell...

.

The Supreme Court today upheld the constitutional validity of the Securtisation Act empowering the financial institutions to attach and sell assets of companies who have defaulted in repaying loans taken by them.

However, the court declared section 17 (2) of the Act as unconstitutional. This provided for pre-deposit of 75 per cent of the liability, if defaulting company wanted to appeal against the order of attachment of its assets.

The securitisation and reconstruction of financial assets and enforcement of Security Interest Act could not be fully enforced by banks and FIs as a private company had moved the Supreme Court challenging the validity of the legislation.

Story continues below this ad

As a result, banks could not fully implement the stringent NPA law despite slapping over 15,000 legal notices on defaulting companies to recover bad loans worth about Rs 20,000 crore. In many cases, the companies rushed to banks for a compromise settlement and paid a portion of the loans. But in other cases, banks and FIs had to attach the properties of defaulting companies.

Although banks and FIs attached properties in many of the cases, they could not sell the properties as the matter was sub-judice. With the apex court upholding the Securitisation Act, banks can now go ahead with auctioning of the attached properties to recover their non-performing assets and use the money for productive purposes.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement