Premium
This is an archive article published on December 9, 2003

SC hears Hindu plea, refers to Statute panel

The Supreme Court today heard another petition filed by The Hindu editor N. Ravi and nine other employees of the newspaper, challenging Sect...

.

The Supreme Court today heard another petition filed by The Hindu editor N. Ravi and nine other employees of the newspaper, challenging Section 499 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) in so far as it relates to the statements made with respect to the conduct of a person in public position, and referred the matter to a five-member constitution bench.

Senior counsel Harish Salve, appearing for the petitioners, contended that Section 499 of the IPC suffers from two infirmities in that it defines the offence of defamation without distinguishing between comments relating to the functioning of public officials or governments and comments relating to individuals.

In the realm of the right of free speech, these two comments are to be judged by entirely different standards. Section 499 treats equally two entirely unequal subject matters, Salve said. At this, Justice Sabharwal said that the provision has stood the test of time — 130 years pre-Constitution and 53 years post-Constitution. Salve pointed out that in pre-Independence days, the idea of protecting officials was different than it is now. To attract the penal provision, a public servant should prove the publication has harmed his reputation, was false, had reckless disregard for truth and was done maliciously.

Criticism of a public servant in public good is vital in a democracy and only the truth is the defence, the counsel contended. Sabharwal, adjourned the matter to next Monday asking the counsel to file relevant case law in this regard.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement