Premium
This is an archive article published on October 5, 2002

Rs 5,400cr guarantees to devolve on state govts

State governments in financial mess are set to find going tougher with massive devolvements of Rs 5,400 crore likely to fall on them in this...

.

State governments in financial mess are set to find going tougher with massive devolvements of Rs 5,400 crore likely to fall on them in this fiscal. Rating agency Crisil estimates that state governments may end up shelling out Rs 44,200 crore in the next five years as many corporations which floated bonds are likely to default on their repayment obligations, thus making it mandatory for the states to step pay up under the guarantee terms.

According to Crisil estimates, there can be a maximum devolvement of Rs 10,500 crore on states in 2002-03 while the minimum could be in the region of Rs 3,600 crore and the most likely devolvement will be around Rs 5,400 crore. In 2003-04, the maximum devolvement will be Rs 13,300 crore, minimum Rs 5,700 crore and a most likely amount of Rs 9,000 crore. Though the total devolvement on state governments for the next five years is likely to be Rs 44,200 crore, it can touch a maximum of Rs 66,200 crore and a low of Rs 22,700 crore. “States went overboard in the last five or six years in extending guarantees to bond issues floated by state-level corporations. Now that the time for repayment is fast approaching, many of them don’t have funds. As per the guarantee terms, the State government will have to repay the money on behalf of the delinquent State corporations,” said an analyst.

Guarantees of state governments shot up by 210 per cent since 1992 as power and irrigation corporations of several states went on a fund mobilising-spree. Guarantees by states touched Rs 124,800 crore from Rs 40,200 in 1992. The RBI has already warned the states about the rising guarantees and asked the governments to bring down this to manageable levels.

Story continues below this ad

“The state governments have extended such guarantees to weak entities with relatively poor credit profiles. These include a large fraction of entities whose stand-alone capacity to service debt is virtually non-existent,” Crisil said. A large number of the state corporations, primarily SPVs, have limited revenue-generating potential. Most of these SPVs have been floated to undertake large irrigation projects, aimed at reducing the dependence on rainfall and thereby providing a boost to the state’s agricultural sector. Some state governments have even diverted funds from these corporations to other areas.

Since the user charges levied are only notional, the expected revenue generation from such SPVs would be negligible. Therefore, any debt raised by such SPVs would inevitably require explicit guarantees. In fact, almost all the SPVs are currently provided full budgetary support by the state governments. Consequently, these guarantees would fully devolve on the state governments and hence, can be considered equivalent to debt.

The risk of the guarantees being invoked has increased due to the worsening risk perception of the state-guaranteed bonds. Currently, even if an entity, whose securities or loans and advances are guaranteed by the state government, is in default, the lenders treat these investments as a standard asset unless the guarantee is invoked. Further, the state governments’ stressed financial conditions could lead to delays in debt repayments by them, causing an increased likelihood of invocation of guarantees.

Five large states — Gujarat, Maharashtra, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu — together account for almost 50 per cent of the aggregate state-level guarantees.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement