Premium
This is an archive article published on March 10, 2006

Republicans rebel over port, eavesdropping and security

After over five years of allowing President George W Bush relatively free rein to set their course, Republicans in Congress are suddenly in rebellion, a mutiny all the more surprising since it centres on the party’s signature issue of national security.

.

After over five years of allowing President George W Bush relatively free rein to set their course, Republicans in Congress are suddenly in rebellion, a mutiny all the more surprising since it centres on the party’s signature issue of national security.

In a rebuke to the White House, House Republicans are moving to put the brakes on the takeover by a Dubai company of some port terminal operations in several large American cities, an effort that moved forward on Wednesday with bipartisan support.

In the case of the port deal, the political considerations are clearly paramount for Republicans and are compelling. Public opinion appears to be against allowing an Arab company to manage some port terminals in the US, Democrats are hammering Republicans on the issue, and the White House has been unable to provide much political cover to its allies.

Story continues below this ad

When it comes to the debate whether to allow eavesdropping without warrants on terror suspects, the politics are more muddled. The White House has had huge success defining that issue as anti-terrorist surveillance.

A perception that conditions in Iraq show little improvement is not helping the relationship. The president and his Congressional allies have been at cross-purposes before, but it has never reached the level of the port confrontation.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement