CHANDIGARH, June 14: The uncharacteristic promptitude with which the Government announced that the recent increase in retirement age would also be applicable to Defence Forces came as a pleasant surprise. Friends still in uniform pulled out the Army List and started calculating their revised promotion prospects. But in the euphoria so generated, many finer points were overlooked.
One needs to go deeper into the problem, which lies in the domain of personnel management. The serviceman has for long had a grudge that while every other section of society in government service or outside, is given what it demands his interest is ignored just because he has no `nuisance value’. He cannot stop trains, go on strike or sit on dharna. He feels discriminated against. The serviceman’s demand is simple.
He wants security of service and status commensurate with his qualifications, hazardous duties and selfless service. These are denied to him for two apparently valid reasons. First, a very steep organisational pyramid where, irrespective of merit and capability, as many as 65 to 70 per cent must forgo promotion at every level except the very basic because there are just no posts. Second, the necessity of maintaining a young and physically fit service profile. The proposed increase in retirement age will neither enhance his izzat nor his pensionary benefits. What is required is a more radical and substantive measure which will give a soldier the desired feeling of security and, simultaneously, make the services an attractive career once again.
Even today organisations like Assam Rifles and Rashtriya Rifles are almost exclusively and creditably manned by servicemen. A statutory provision now needs to be made for induction of qualified servicemen in other organisations, though there is bound to be strong resistance which can be overcome by national and political will.