Premium
This is an archive article published on September 3, 2005

‘Pressure on Laloo’ was Buta concern before he asked for Central rule

Pressure by RJD MLAs on party chief Laloo Prasad Yadav to either form a UPA-style government in Bihar or failing that ‘‘ensure con...

.

Pressure by RJD MLAs on party chief Laloo Prasad Yadav to either form a UPA-style government in Bihar or failing that ‘‘ensure continuance of President’s Rule’’ were high on Governor Buta Singh’s mind before he recommended dissolution of the state Assembly in May when President A P J Abdul Kalam was on a state visit to Moscow.

‘‘According to a report, there is a lot of pressure by the RJD MLAs on Lalu Prasad to either form the government in Bihar on UPA pattern in the Centre, with the support of Congress, LJP and others or he should at least ensure the continuance of President’s rule in the state.’’

These are recorded in the two ‘‘secret’’ reports of the Governor submitted to the Supreme Court today by the Centre.

Story continues below this ad

Writing on May 21, the Governor said: ‘‘Reports received by me in the recent past through media and also through meeting with various political functionaries, as also intelligence reports, indicate a trend to win over elected representatives of the people.’’

He reminded the President that he had ‘‘informed (in his first report on April 27) that around 16-17 MLAs belonging to LJP were being wooed by various means so that a split could be effected in the LJP.’’

The Governor said the general secretary of LJP had resigned and ‘‘also 17-18 more (LJP MLAs) perhaps are moving towards JD-U clearly indicating that various allurements have been offered which is a very disturbing and alarming feature.’’

Buta Singh felt that any move by the breakaway faction to align with any other party to cobble up a majority and stake claim to form a government would affect the constitutional provisions and safeguards built therein. It would also ‘‘distort the verdict of the people as shown by the results of the recent elections’’, he said. ‘‘If these attempts are allowed it would amount to tampering with constitutional provisions.’’

Story continues below this ad

‘‘Hence, in my view, a situation has arisen in the state wherein it would be desirable in the interest of the state that the Assembly presently kept in suspended animation is dissolved’’ so as to give its voters another opportunity to exercise their mandate, he said. The April 27 report also stated that JD(U) felt that even if the LJP did not split, it could still form the government with the support of ‘‘Independent, NCP, BSP and SP MLAs and two-third of Cong MLAs .’’

Ananthakrishnan G. is a Senior Assistant Editor with The Indian Express. He has been in the field for over 23 years, kicking off his journalism career as a freelancer in the late nineties with bylines in The Hindu. A graduate in law, he practised in the District judiciary in Kerala for about two years before switching to journalism. His first permanent assignment was with The Press Trust of India in Delhi where he was assigned to cover the lower courts and various commissions of inquiry. He reported from the Delhi High Court and the Supreme Court of India during his first stint with The Indian Express in 2005-2006. Currently, in his second stint with The Indian Express, he reports from the Supreme Court and writes on topics related to law and the administration of justice. Legal reporting is his forte though he has extensive experience in political and community reporting too, having spent a decade as Kerala state correspondent, The Times of India and The Telegraph. He is a stickler for facts and has several impactful stories to his credit. ... Read More

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement