Nuclear history News Archive News

As China considers its position on the Indo-US civil nuclear initiative at the International Atomic Energy Agency...

Written by Crajamohan

July 30, 2008 12:00 AM IST

5 min read

As China considers its position on the Indo-US civil nuclear initiative at the International Atomic Energy Agency this week, Beijing will do well to ponder on its own atomic history. There are many similarities in the way the nuclear attitudes of China and India have evolved over the decades. Looking back at their own integration into the global nuclear order should give some pause to some Chinese analysts who argue that Beijing cannot accept a change of global non-proliferation regime to accommodate India. Long before it became a champion of the non-proliferation regime, China was an outsider that constantly challenged these very same rules. Like India which until recently criticised the international arms control regimes as discriminatory and unacceptable, China too denounced them in the early 1960s. As the US and Communist Russia unveiled the Partial Test Ban Treaty in 1963, a year before China conducted its first nuclear test, Beijing rejected 8216;non-proliferation8217; as a 8216;joint plot8221; by the superpowers to keep it down. Although the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty of 1970 protected China8217;s status as a nuclear weapon power, Beijing dismissed it as a symbol of unacceptable 8216;superpower hegemony8217;. It is only after Deng Xiaoping put China on the course of sweeping economic reforms and foreign policy pragmatism in the late 1970s that China began to review its attitudes towards to non-proliferation and arms control. China signed on to the NPT in 1992 and was only a few years ago admitted to the Nuclear Suppliers Group. Although Chinese analysts tend to question the Indo-US deal in terms of norms and legality, Beijing, one should assume, will take a political view of the issues involved. If China sees that India8217;s rise is irreversible and its accommodation into the global nuclear order inevitable, Beijing will have few incentives to oppose the Indo-US deal. While some in China apprehend that the deal could accelerate the construction of a strategic partnership between New Delhi and Washington, others recognise that Beijing8217;s opposition 8212; explicit or implicit8212; might push India closer towards the United States.

Unleashing Pakistan

It is not the United States alone that shapes China8217;s power calculus on India. Pakistan is as important. Nuclear history also tells us that after India8217;s first nuclear test in May 1974, Beijing moved quickly to assist Islamabad8217;s nuclear weapon programme and allowed it to acquire atomic parity with India. As the Indo-US deal separates India from Pakistan, China8217;s traditional policy of promoting parity between New Delhi and Islamabad has come under severe stress. Beijing has three options on the nuclear deal. One is to stay neutral and go with the flow at the IAEA and the NSG. Second, is to use Pakistan and the Europeans to block or delay the deal at the IAEA and the NSG. Third, is to come out openly in support of the Indo-US deal, and position itself as a genuine partner of India. The problem for China is that the first option will have little credibility, the second will undermine relations with India, and the third demands a fundamental recasting of Beijing8217;s traditional South Asia policy in New Delhi8217;s favour. Beijing8217;s dilemmas are not impossible to resolve. After all the Bush administration has managed to improve relations with both India and Pakistan while discarding the past 8220;even-handed8221; policy in South Asia. China, which is acutely sensitive to changing regional balances, cannot be blind to the fact that India is pulling away from Pakistan on all indicators of power. This demands that China swallow the lump in its throat, accept India8217;s new nuclear status and work with the new geopolitical reality in the subcontinent. Inertia, however, is a powerful retarding force on all governments, and it is never easy to change old policies.

SAARC diplomacy

After we hear from the Chinese at the IAEA on Friday, its foreign minister Yang Jiechi is likely to be in Colombo mingling with the subcontinent8217;s leaders over the weekend at the 15th Summit of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation. China is among the many new states, including the United States, European Union, Japan, South Korea and Iran, that have been admitted as observers into SAARC. If Beijing reveals a positive attitude towards the Indo-US nuclear deal at the IAEA, New Delhi must in turn signal that it is ready for genuine cooperation with China in deepening regional integration through the SAARC. It is no secret that China has sought an increasing role within the SAARC and India has been hesitant to let that happen all these years. If China makes it clear that it will not seek to balance India within the subcontinent, New Delhi has no reason to undercut Beijing8217;s profile in South Asia. Working together, they can redefine the economic future of the subcontinent.

The writer is a Professor at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore iscrmohanntu.edu.sg

Tags: