
There is almost no other term of abuse more offensive in French politics than the word 8220;libeacute;ral8221;. Except, perhaps, for the term 8220;ultra-libeacute;ral8221;. Not because in France the word is associated with progressive politics, or a woolly sort of bleeding-heart political correctness8230; The French use it almost exclusively to caricature classical economic liberalism: blind faith in free markets and competition.
Now Bertrand Delanoeuml;, the Socialist mayor of Paris and a potential candidate to lead the Socialist Party, has kicked up a stink with his claim that he is a liberal8230; in a book he published last week, De L8217;Audace, astonishing because the Socialists8230; spend most of their time hurling this form of abuse at the right.
Could this mean that the French Socialists are about to drag themselves out of the palaeolithic age, and turn themselves into a modern electable party of the left? Somehow I doubt it. So far at least, this has not been a debate about the right balance between the market and the state8230; It has rather been a matter of brand-definition ahead of a fierce fight over the Socialist leadership8230; Mr Delanoeuml;, flush from victory at the mayoral poll in March, looks certain to bid for the top job. Ms Royal has already said she wants it. And even the younger generation is starting to seize the term, in order to sharpen their own brand image.
Excerpted from 8216;French, Socialist and Liberal8217; in The Economist