Premium
This is an archive article published on October 11, 2007

Letters to the editor

Seema Chishti’s ‘Shoaib effect and Indian Muslims’ deserves congratulations although the phrase ‘Indian Muslims’ is a bit jarring.

.

No identity stasis

Seema Chishti’s ‘Shoaib effect and Indian Muslims’ deserves congratulations although the phrase ‘Indian Muslims’ is a bit jarring. Nobody says ‘Indian Hindus’, so why should it be different for Muslims? After all, as the traumatised Gujarati woman put it, “This is my land.”

The writer is right to stress that “the new identity which, in many ways, is a work in progress”. I feel Azim Premji, the doyen of the Indian IT sector, typifies this emerging identity. He is modern,forward-looking, and as much of a nationalist as anyone else. Look at the socio-religious backgrounds of WIPRO employees and this will become clear. I am sure Muslims in India, imbued with a modern identity, will carve a niche for themselves. Economic development and personal aggrandisement brook no bars — whether it is that of religion or nationalism.

— S.R. Kasbekar

Mumbai

Story continues below this ad

In her article, ‘The Shoaib effect and Indian Muslims’, Seema Chishti has reconfirmed what Mahatma Gandhi envisioned. The two-nation theory based on religion has failed in Pakistan, too. Indian Muslims have gone far ahead of what even Mohmmad Ali Jinnah had argued for while carving out a separate nation.

— Naval Langa

Ahmedabad

Spies of the land

The discerning piece, ‘Malice in Blunderland’ by former cabinet secretary, T.S.R. Subramanian, and your editorial, Spy versus shy confirm, if confirmation was needed, that while the Official Secrets Act is a disgrace for any democracy; the country can afford to do without a toothless CBI like the one it is currently paying for. The powers-that-be at the country’s helm of affairs seem to have no respect for public money. Otherwise, they would not tolerate the rot which Maj Gen V.K. Singh has exposed in the country’s external intelligence agency. Look at how the CBI applied different standards of investigation in cases involving Mayawati and Mulayam Singh, one a reigning CM, and another who reigned as CM immediately before her. Who says there is determination to fight corruption in high places and a commitment to transparency?

— Prasad Malladi

Basivireddypeta, AP

Scions’ age

Sudheendra Kulkarni’s article, ‘Some Gandhian lessons for the Gandhis’ contains one grave factual error. According to Kulkarni, Harilal Gandhi died in 1955. The fact is that Harilal Gandhi died on June 18, 1948, barely six month after Gandhiji’s assassination. Let Kulkarni enrich his knowledge by devoting more to reading instead of criticising others. He criticises the Congress for appointing 37-year-old Rahul Gandhi the general secretary of the party. Let me tell him that Gandhiji became an accepted leader of Indians in South Africa when he was barely 33 years old. The Congress unanimously chose 41-year-old Subhas Chandra Bose as the president of the party in 1938. A person’s ability, sincerity, competence and integrity are more important factors than his age. And today we need dynamic leaders.

— Hitesh Parmar

Rajkot

Classical mechanics

THE ‘Chak De’ effect seems to have spilled over to our cricket team and the Sensex, which touched the historic high of 18,000, defying gravity. Our economy is doing very well but mid-term polls could spoil the party. What’s gone up will come down!

— S.N. Kabra Mumbai

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement