Premium
This is an archive article published on December 10, 1997

Jones trims damages in case against Clinton

LITTLE ROCK, Dec 9: Paula Jones reduced the damages sought in her sexual harassment lawsuit against US President Bill Clinton to $ 525,000 ...

.

LITTLE ROCK, Dec 9: Paula Jones reduced the damages sought in her sexual harassment lawsuit against US President Bill Clinton to $ 525,000 from $ 700,000, and officially dropped defamation claims against Clinton’s co-defendant.

Her revised complaint, which was expected, also added assertions that Clinton, as governor, gave preferential treatment to female state employees who succumbed to his sexual advances.

Yesterday’s filing came two weeks after a federal judge gave Jones approval to drop some of her claims against Danny Ferguson, Clinton’s former bodyguard.

Story continues below this ad

Jones had claimed that Ferguson tarnished her reputation by saying she was eager to be Clinton’s mistress. Without the claim, lawyers may have less reason to delve into Jones’ past.

Ferguson’s lawyer, Bill Bristow, has already questioned potential witnesses about Jones’ past relationships and job history, saying that he needs “to determine what her reputation is” to defend his client against the defamation claim.

The amount sought in compensatory and punitive damages in the lawsuit was dropped because the defamation claim was deleted.

Jones, in her lawsuit filed in May 1994, claims that Clinton exposed himself and asked for oral sex in a Little Rock hotel room in 1991, when he was governor and she was a state employee.

Story continues below this ad

Clinton has denied Jones’ allegations and said he does not recall meeting her.

The new complaint adds language asserting that Clinton, as governor, granted governmental and employment benefits, such as raises and promotions, to women who succumbed to his solicitation of sexual favours.

Jones also claims she suffered a hostile work environment because she rejected Clinton and was denied those benefits.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement