After getting the three smaller, younger—and more financially dependent—IIMs to sign MoUs that clearly compromise their autonomy, the Government is now flaunting resolutions from two of them, Lucknow and Indore, supporting the fee-cut ahead of the case being re-opened in the Supreme Court. Incidentally, these MoUs were signed barely three months ago and after the more established IIMs, at Ahmedabad, Bangalore and Kolkata—A, B, C—refused to buckle, HRD Minister Murli Manohar Joshi announced the fee cut. The controls spelt out in the MOU fly in the face of Joshi’s protestations that he had no intention to interfere with the autonomy of the IIMs. The MOU, for instance, stipulates that the institute ‘‘shall not create a post, upgrade or re-designate a post, change the pay-scale or allowance of a post.’’ It also binds the institute ‘‘to abide by economy instructions issued from time to time by the Government of India.’’ Worse, the MOU goes to the extent of saying that the institute will not have the freedom to ‘‘take any step, without prior consulation with the HRD Ministry, that may lead to enhanced financial burden on the Government of India than agreed to by the latter.’’ Today, IIM Indore joined IIM Lucknow in passing a resolution which supported the ministry’s fee slash. A meeting of the board of governors adopted a resolution accepting that the government had the prerogative to make policy decisions on fees in fully funded Central institutes. IIM Lucknow has already passed a resolution along the same lines. Playing poor vs rich