Premium
This is an archive article published on July 1, 2004

Hang the hanging

• The case of Dhananjoy Chatterjee has once again brought to focus the ethics of capital punishment (‘...

.

The case of Dhananjoy Chatterjee has once again brought to focus the ethics of capital punishment (‘At the president’s mercy’, IE, June 28). The mercy petition is being examined by the president and Chatterjee’s fate hangs on it. The earlier apex court decision to award death sentences to four members of the Veerappan gang (which is now stayed) and the case of captured Iraq president, Saddam Hussein, have also provoked voices against the award of capital punishment.
One believes that the crimes were proved beyond reasonable doubt. Yet, the death sentences, once executed, is irrevocable. Capital punishments have been abolished in many countries and many consider it barbaric in nature. There are also discussions on the method of executing a person. Yet whatever way it is done, it is still barbaric.

—V.S. Venkatavaradan Salem

Ignorance?

Bibek Debroy, in his infinite communist ignorance, asks: “Third, when talking about merit and efficiency, what are we comparing with what?” (‘Captain, a hole in your argument’, IE, June 28). Here is the answer, dear communist: the efficiency is compared to the efficiency of similar firms in liberalising economies like Malaysia and others. You cannot determine these by gazing on your navel and making predictions — which might be the most favored technique of “economic analysis” by certain so-called “intellectuals”. One only hopes that people like him will not take us all back down the sewer after we have worked so hard to make a difference.

—Hank Ahluwalia On e-mail

Leave it be

The private sector has performed better than the public sector in the absence of reservation. If 50 years of the state’s efforts have failed to uplift the backward classes, the tinkering with private sector recruitment is hardly expected to do it miraculously. Hence, regardless of what the Manusmriti says or the Patels do in a certain village, status quo should continue.

—J.M. Manchanda New Delhi

Left out

Story continues below this ad

This is regarding the Left’s opposition to the proposed privatisation of the Mumbai and Delhi airports. Reading their statements, I wonder which century I am living in! The main contention of these parties is that the AAI has sufficient funds to modernise airports. The simple question to them would be why has nothing been done so far. One just needs to visit our airports to see the condition they are in. If the unions are so concerned about their work place, then they must have initiated a modernisation project long ago. The point is that the the workers simply fear that they may be held accountable for their work in case privatisation goes ahead. This lack of accountability is, in fact, the main reason why all the government concerns must be privatised. The arguments put forth by the leftist unions do not have any place in these times when individuals are recognised by the work they put in.

—Anand G. Mumbai Tailpiece

Kuldip Nayar wants to be reappointed as ambassador again, it appears (‘Life begins at 60’, IE, June 29).

—N.B. Mehta On e-mail

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement