Premium
This is an archive article published on June 29, 2005

Growth target? Yawn!

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh drew attention to low growth levels in the farm sector at the National Development Council meeting. He pointed...

.

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh drew attention to low growth levels in the farm sector at the National Development Council meeting. He pointed out that though the growth target for the Tenth Plan period (2002-07) was set at 8.1 per cent, the Planning Commission’s mid-term appraisal shows that it averaged 6.5 per cent in the first three years of the plan period. This was mainly on account of the dampening effect of low growth in agriculture — a sector that accounts for one-fourth of GDP. Instead of growing at the targeted rate of 4 per cent, this sector grew at 1.5 per cent during these years.

The prime minister has also asked chief ministers to look at the possibility of doubling agricultural output in ten years. This means that the growth rate of agricultural output should be 7 per cent. While both the PM and Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia talked about reforms in agriculture and power, a somewhat realistic look would suggest that these targets are rather pointless. Though the Planning Commission continues to use the word ‘target’, actually it is more of a hope — since the government cannot even guarantee rain water. In fact what is called a ‘target’ is often not even a forecast, based on past behaviour of the sector or contingent upon scenarios for good, bad and normal monsoons.

As a result, the performance for the first three years does not seem to have affected the forecast, or ‘target’, for the next two years — 2005-06 and 2006-07 — which is 7-8 per cent. Since the ‘target’ is based on expectations of a normal monsoon, it could easily be lower if the monsoon does not come up to scratch. In fact, expected GDP growth in 2005-06 was — until the beginning of this monsoon — 6.6 per cent. However, somewhat poor monsoons have pulled forecasts down to 6 per cent. Consequently, instead of a growth of 3.1 per cent, agricultural output is expected to fall by 0.7 per cent. In case this forecast is correct, it is unlikely that the Planning Commission ‘target’ of 7-8 per cent will be met this year either. In most modern market economies, while various agencies — both government and private — forecast economic growth, the Soviet planning vocabulary of ‘target’ is no longer used. In India, too, since the government does not, thankfully, control the behaviour of individual economic agents, this vocabulary is inappropriate. Since prime ministers, who are the chairpersons of the Planning Commission, cannot announce a step down in target, regardless of rising oil prices or poor monsoons, these numbers will continue to be meaningless. Perhaps the sleepy response from the country’s chief ministers at the NDC was then a most appropriate one.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement