Foxed

The story was huge, or at least could have been 8212; President Bush8217;s long-awaited proof that the Iraqis were manufacturing chemical ...

Written by VERNE GAY

Washington | March 26, 2003 12:00 AM IST

4 min read

The story was huge, or at least could have been 8212; President Bush8217;s long-awaited proof that the Iraqis were manufacturing chemical weapons.

Huge, but for one glitch: It apparently wasn8217;t true. Fox News Channel Monday had to back away from the story that it so widely reported on Sunday 8212; that coalition forces had found a 8216;8216;huge8217;8217; chemical factory south of Baghdad in An Najaf 8212; because General Tommy Franks said Monday that he 8216;8216;wasn8217;t entirely sure8217;8217; it was a chemical factory after all.

Fox would report 8212; if, perhaps, a little under its breath 8212; Franks8217; disavowal, just as it has reported a crush of other stories in the past few days. But was Fox8217;s An Najaf bobble one of those minor journalistic fender benders that happens in times of war, when three 24-hour news networks are crashing stories minute by minute, sometimes second to second? Or did it reveal one of the pitfalls of Fox8217;s unique brand of war coverage, wrapped, as it were, in red, white and blue?

Unabashedly patriotic, Fox appears to have captured the mood of most cable news viewers at this moment: The network was far and away the nation8217;s top-rated cable network before this war, and remains far and away the nation8217;s top-rated cable news network six days into the war.

No surprise, but a blow to CNN, which had hoped to move ahead in the opening days and establish that viewers in US will always drift back to the world8217;s biggest TV news organisation during times of war. In last Friday8217;s ratings, Fox was seen by 4,017,000 throughout the day, or double its usual level, and by 5,586,000 in prime time, also double.

Likewise, CNN and MSNBC also posted dramatically higher numbers: 4.3 million and 2.4 million in prime time, respectively. MSNBC nearly trebled its usual prime-time performance. 8216;8216;All three of the cable news operations have been doing some outstanding things but there8217;s no question that Fox8217;s anchors 8230; bring all of their agendas to the news portion of the broadcasts that are traditionally things that have been kept separate,8217;8217; says Alex Jones, director of the Joan Shorenstein Center on Press, Politics and Public Policy at Harvard University.

8216;8216;I remember several times in which I8217;ve seen anchors interviewing someone and that person said something they disagreed with, and then start yelling at them, 8216;How can you say that!8217; It8217;s very outside the professional way of doing things.8217;8217;

Story continues below this ad

Not surprising at all, but did Fox pump the An Najaf story because it was the patriotic thing to do? 8216;8216;Look, we have to be honest with ourselves and admit it is a war and we8217;re doing the best job we can, and have information coming into the building fast and furious8230;while we8217;re trying to get this stuff confirmed and verified,8217;8217; said Bill Shine, network executive producer of Fox.

8216;8216;Every once in a while, we8217;re going to make a mistake, and we8217;re trying to learn our lessons and move on.8217;8217; On Fox8217;s flag-waving, he said: 8216;8216;You don8217;t give up your American citizenship when you8217;re a journalist. There isn8217;t anyone here who doesn8217;t wake up every day and says to themselves, 8216;Wow, I8217;m an American and there are American troops over there 8230;8217; 8217;8217;. LAT-WP

Tags: