Premium
This is an archive article published on July 12, 1999

Different Strokes

Crossing the bridge by July 15SEBI's top brass is getting hot under the collar. On July 15, the finance minister is scheduled to inaugura...

.

Crossing the bridge by July 15

SEBI’s top brass is getting hot under the collar. On July 15, the finance minister is scheduled to inaugurate BSE’s Central Depository of Securities (CDSL), but there is still no sign of connectivity between CSDL and the National Share Depository (NSDL). Why did SEBI permit CDSL to commence operations? A magazine had asked the obvious question several months ago and a SEBI executive director had replied that it would cross the bridge when it came to it. Now the bridge has a deadline: July 15; and SEBI has found that the bridge is not a telephone connection (which it was pushing hard for last week) but a more complex one, in the form of software interface, whose construction is still underway. It has now been announced that the interconnectivity bridge will be ready on August 7, subject to testing and barring unforeseen circumstances. But it raises more questions. How on earth did CDSL choose software that was not compatible with that of the NSDL? Why was such a fussbeing made about the inter-depository transaction charge of 10 basis points when the software was the more serious hurdle? Did the SEBI’s findings in connection with payment crisis last June force it to clear CDSL with undue haste? Maybe the FM will ask a few questions while he cuts the red ribbon on July 15.

Delisting junk companies

A recent news report says that SEBI favours the delisting of thousands of junk companies from all bourses — those which were not traded in years and had no real investors. The sentiment is fine, but the hitch is that the Chandatre panel set up by SEBI itself has made delisting of junk companies extremely difficult. For instance, the BSE alone could be rid of thousands of junk companies and improve its surveillance of the remaining if allowed to do so. But there are other problems. By SEBI’s criteria, these companies are not treated as having `vanished’ for the purposes of action against the promoters. They are only delinquent in paying listing fees. This means that ifSEBI decides to allow bourses to get rid of junk companies, it would also have to classify them under the `vanished’ tag and initiate action to recover investors’ money, as demanded by investor groups. If SEBI makes things easier for stock exchanges, it will only make things tough for itself.

Fire, fire

Story continues below this ad

ICICI’s fancy new building, estimated at over Rs 250 crore, has already had its first mishap. Though the papers called it a tiny fire, we hear that the staff had to stay away for a few days and that the damage caused by burning plastic and furnishing was not inconsequential. While ICICI is going to be spending more money to repair the damage, there is no sign of it finalising the sale of its old office building, which seems unlikely to fetch more than Rs 70-odd crore. SEBI is apparently willing to cough up more than the Birlas or HLL were ready to offer (based on a HDFC valuation), but even that will not happen until SEBI finds a buyer for its present premises. Shareholders who are already unhappywith ICICI’s top brass giving themselves hefty pay hikes, are watching its lavish spending with disquiet. One small shareholder writes to say that its former JV partner — Prudential — has moved to a smaller office after splitting with ICICI. Has the ICICI board ever asked any questions about its lavish ways, he asks. We’ve no answers.

Bulls Vs bears

The BSE is beginning to feel the bite of the new teeth acquired by its senior officers after the unceremonious sacking of former executive director R C Mathur. The usual tussle between bulls and bears is on again, and a top BSE director asked to see the trading position of a big time bull operator in the market. For the first time, BSE officers apparently refused point blank. The BSE claims to be worried about the safety of the market and has even been alerting the regulator. The broker was asked to cough up a hefty ad hoc margin, but even that left him unfazed, he asked them to name the sum and he would sign a cheque. The BSE probably has reason toworry, but this time it is going to find it tough to bully its officers into bending any rules.

Author’s email: suchetadalal@yahoo.com

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement