Premium
This is an archive article published on March 13, 2004

Big Brother HRD cornered in the court

For all its professions that the fee cut does not amount to meddling, the HRD Ministry today baulked at giving an undertaking to the Supreme...

.

For all its professions that the fee cut does not amount to meddling, the HRD Ministry today baulked at giving an undertaking to the Supreme Court that it would not 8216;8216;interfere8217;8217; with the autonomy of the IIMs.

But as the court insisted on a Government undertaking on the PIL challenging its fee cut order, Additional Solicitor General Mukul Rohtagi sought time 8216;8216;to take instructions at highest level.8217;8217;

While granting a week to the Government to make up its mind, a bench headed by Chief Justice V N Khare said that once the Government gives the necessary undertaking, the court will clarify that 8216;8216;if any issue is raised on autonomy on a future date,8217;8217; the aggrieved party will be at liberty to seek a legal remedy.

This observation of Justice Khare8212;made entirely on his own8212;echoes the resolution passed two days ago by the faculty of IIM Ahmedabad asserting the institute8217;s right to seek a legal remedy against the fee cut.

The tenor of today8217;s proceedings made it clear that if the Government declines to give an undertaking on March 19, the court will, as requested by the petitioners, recall its February 27 order disposing of the PIL and decide the fee cut on merits.

Countering the plea for an undertaking, Rohtagi said it was fraught with problems as there was no accepted definition of autonomy. 8216;8216;What is autonomy?8217;8217; he asked, adding that there were those who condemned Big Brother HRD cornered in the court even the attempt to increase the seats as an attack on the autonomy of the IIMs.

Justice Khare sought to allay his fears saying, 8216;8216;Autonomy in common parlance is very well understood.8217;8217;

Story continues below this ad

Deriding the petitioners8217; plea as an attempt to secure 8216;8216;a certificate of good behaviour,8217;8217; Rohtagi said if the word undertaking was inserted in the court order, any decision taken by the Government in connection with the IIMs would lead to contempt proceedings.

Calling the plea for undertaking as 8216;8216;mala fide,8217;8217; Rohtagi said, 8216;8216;the Government knows who are the people behind the attempt to blow the issue out of proportion.8217;8217;

The petitioners8217; counsel, Harish Salve, took exception to the charge of mala fide as that that amounts to, he said, 8216;8216;a personal attack.8217;8217; He added for good measure that neither he nor any of the petitioners aspired to play any role in the management of the IIMs.

Although today8217;s hearing was held under the shadow of an ugly confrontation last Tuesday between HRD ministry officials and the IIM Ahmedabad Society, Salve made no reference to it in the court and, in an apparent strategic move, focused on cornering the Government on the undertaking already sought.

Story continues below this ad

As The Indian Express first reported, HRD Joint Secretary V S Pandey had threatened to dismiss the IIMA society, take over the management of the institute. And, to top it all, had told the IIMA Society that the fee cut was a 8216;8216;political agenda8217;8217; and dared the institute to come in the Government8217;s way.

 

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement