Premium
This is an archive article published on June 29, 2002

Army’s court of inquiry raises a few questions for Tehelka

In what could become a trend for the line of defence taken by indicted Army officers before the Justice Venkatswami Commission, the Tehelka ...

.

In what could become a trend for the line of defence taken by indicted Army officers before the Justice Venkatswami Commission, the Tehelka team is now being confronted with portions of the 275-page proceedings of the Army’s own court of inquiry.

A copy of the proceedings, held between March and April last year, has been provided to the Commission. Yesterday, Tehelka chief Tarun Tejpal was quizzed with parts of the evidence by Major General Manjit Singh Ahluwalia, one of the two serving officers facing administrative action after being named in the ‘‘defence deal’’ scam.

Ahluwalia, Director General, Ordnance and Supply, who has now sought premature retirement, got an admission in court from Tejpal that the portal may have erred in making allegations of bribery against him.

Story continues below this ad

After the hearing, Tejpal admitted to The Indian Express: ‘‘If this is case of an error being made in someone’s case, we have no qualms in making amends and apologising for it. This is what I said in court when General Ahluwalia questioned me. The fact is that this was a huge and complicated investigation and some glitches are bound to be there.’’

In the transcript of Operation Westend, Ahluwalia is first shown as refusing the Rs 50,000 bribe offered to him but it is stated that this was accepted by him ‘‘later.’’ Court of inquiry, proceedings, accessed by The Indian Express, reveal that Mathew had himself admitted ‘‘refusing’ to give the Rs 50,000 meant for General Ahluwalia to Lt Col Sayal (Retd) before the Court of Inqiry. During his cross-examination of Tejpal, Ahluwalia told him that Tehelka reporter Mathew Samuel had denied paying him any money.

This is the first such public admission for Tehelka as far as the role of the defence officers is concerned and assumes significance since Ahluwalia in March 2002 filed a defamation suit against Tehelka, asking for Rs 2 crore in damages.

He has now got a reprive since Tejpal has stated that if it was true that his staffer admitted before the Court of Inquiry that the general never demanded money from the Westend team, they were willing to make the necessary amends.

Story continues below this ad

Interestingly, while proceedings in the Venkatswami Commission have gathered pace, the Army has been slow with its own own inquiry process.

After the court of inquiry report was finalised, three officers were ordered to face court-martial proceedings and two were to face administrative action.

Almost a year later, the summary of evidence proceedings against the three indicted officers has not begun in earnest and administrative action against the other two, not yet finalised.

Ritu Sarin is Executive Editor (News and Investigations) at The Indian Express group. Her areas of specialisation include internal security, money laundering and corruption. Sarin is one of India’s most renowned reporters and has a career in journalism of over four decades. She is a member of the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) since 1999 and since early 2023, a member of its Board of Directors. She has also been a founder member of the ICIJ Network Committee (INC). She has, to begin with, alone, and later led teams which have worked on ICIJ’s Offshore Leaks, Swiss Leaks, the Pulitzer Prize winning Panama Papers, Paradise Papers, Implant Files, Fincen Files, Pandora Papers, the Uber Files and Deforestation Inc. She has conducted investigative journalism workshops and addressed investigative journalism conferences with a specialisation on collaborative journalism in several countries. ... Read More

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement