Telangana doctor couple’s protracted child custody battle: HC overturns lower court order, grants shared parenting
‘Treat shared custody not as a personal convenience or negotiation, but as a mandatory, child-centred obligation,’ says Telangana High Court.
Written by Rahul V Pisharody
Hyderbad | Updated: November 29, 2025 08:11 PM IST
2 min read
Whatsapp
twitter
Facebook
Reddit
Since 2013, the wife has been living with her parents, and a court petition for guardianship of the child filed in 2014 was ruled in her favour by the lower court in October 2022. An appeal was filed by the husband in 2023. (File Photo)
The Telangana High Court recently allowed a family court appeal filed by a father, overturning a lower court’s decision, and granted shared custody of the couple’s 13-year-old son.
The Division Bench of Justice Moushumi Bhattacharya and Justice Gadi Praveen Kumar, effectively ending a protracted custody battle between a separated doctor couple, criticised the lower court for being prejudiced and the respondent-mother for her “stubborn attitude” regarding the child’s access.
The dispute stems from a petition filed by the father seeking custody of the minor child, which the lower court dismissed, restricting custody solely to the mother. The couple have been married since 2010 and have a son born in 2012. Since 2013, the wife has been living with her parents, and a court petition for guardianship of the child filed in 2014 was ruled in her favour by the lower court in October 2022. An appeal was filed by the husband in 2023.
During the proceedings, the high court expressed surprise at the “continuous resistance on the part of the respondent… opposing the shared custody of the child with the appellant…”
The court also recorded “the stubborn attitude of the respondent even in terms of the suggestion of increasing the visitation rights of the appellant” pending hearing of the Appeal.
The Telangana High Court noted, “the respondent appears to have painted a negative picture towards the appellant in the mind of the boy.”
“The Trial Court failed to appreciate various aspects, and was prejudiced by its interaction with the child without proving the allegations levelled against the appellant,” the high court observed, while setting aside the order and allowing shared custody of the boy.
Story continues below this ad
The court directed both parents to look after the welfare of the child, “leaving apart their personal egos/misunderstandings”, and treat the shared custody “not as a matter of personal convenience or negotiation, but as a mandatory, child-centred obligation.”
Rahul V Pisharody is Assistant Editor with the Indian Express Online and has been reporting for IE on various news developments from Telangana since 2019. He is currently reporting on legal matters from the Telangana High Court.
Rahul started his career as a journalist in 2011 with The New Indian Express and worked in different roles at the Hyderabad bureau for over 8 years. As Deputy Metro Editor, he was in charge of the Hyderabad bureau of the newspaper and coordinated with the team of city reporters, district correspondents, other centres and internet desk for over three years.
A native of Palakkad in Kerala, Rahul has a Master's degree in Communication (Print and New Media) from the University of Hyderabad and a Bachelor's degree in Business Management from PSG College of Arts and Science, Coimbatore. ... Read More