Premium
This is an archive article published on August 13, 2024

Western Ghats: States’ submission on ESAs to Centre’s committee based on old surveys

New mining projects, thermal power plants, sand mining, quarrying, township constructions are banned in villages proposed as ESAs.

Western Ghats, eco-sensitive area, ESAs in Western Ghats, govt surveys, Environment Ministry expert panel, who is Sanjay Kumar, Centres draft notification, mining projects, thermal power plants, sand mining, Indian express newsIt is learnt that most states, except Gujarat — where the spread of ESA proposed (449 sq km) is the smallest — have sought reductions in the area under ESA. (File Photo)

The Centre’s expert panel — tasked with finalising the extent of eco-sensitive areas (ESA) in the Western Ghats — has received submissions broadly based on old ground truthing surveys carried out by states governments, The Indian Express has learnt.
The Environment Ministry’s expert panel headed by Sanjay Kumar, former Director General of Forest, is currently examining objections and submissions by six states to arrive at a consensus after the Centre last week reissued a draft notification demarcating ESAs in the Western Ghats across 56,825 sq km.

New mining projects, thermal power plants, sand mining, quarrying, township constructions are banned in villages proposed as ESAs.

Gujarat, Maharashtra, Goa, Karnataka, Kerala and Tamil Nadu carried out the surveys between 2013 and 2018 to physically verify the extent of villages declared as ESA by Centre in a draft notification based on the K Kasturirangan panel’s report.

“Everyone has presented their region specific implementation problems and hurdles. Some have sought exclusion only, some have sought exclusion and inclusion of ESAs. The submissions are largely based on the past ground surveys,” a source, aware of developments, said.

It is learnt that the expert panel is being assisted by the Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, Dehradun to verify the green cover and extent of villages marked as ESA and weed out survey errors.

A Goa government official confirmed on the condition of anonymity that the statewide physical verification surveys carried out in the past to demarcate ESAs in the state were at the heart of the submissions made to the Centre’s expert panel. “The surveys in the past had shown overlaps, spelling mistakes and gaps with regards to the villages demarcated as ESAs based on the Kasturirangan report. We have reconciled these gaps and sent them to the panel,” the official said.

It is learnt that most states, except Gujarat — where the spread of ESA proposed (449 sq km) is the smallest — have sought reductions in the area under ESA. There has been negligible headway made with Karnataka as they have rejected implementation of the Kasturirangan panel’s recommendations.

Story continues below this ad

For Kerala, where the devastating Wayanad landslides has brought the focus back on the long-standing opposition to ESAs for Western Ghats protection, the committee has sought more information from them, sources said.

In 2014, the Centre had issued the first draft notification declaring 56,825 sq km as ESA based on the Kasturirangan report, which was opposed by most states, demanding that ground verification exercises be carried out.

The old ground truthing reports and the minutes of meetings between Centre and states show that Maharashtra, Goa, Kerala, Karnataka and Tamil Nadu had sought dilutions in the ESAs.

Maharashtra, for instance, had sought to exclude 388 villages from ESA protection and add 347 villages. They sought exclusion of villages as they fell in existing industrial zones, mining areas or were essential for development. The state had proposed to reduce the proposed ESA area from 17,340 sq km to 15,359.49 sq km.

Story continues below this ad

In 2013, Kerala had formed a three-member expert panel to physically verify the ESAs and had reduced the ESAs in the state from 13,108.7 sq km to 9,993.7 sq km. This conclusion was also added to the first draft notification on Western Ghats.

However, the state later sought to reduce the ESA area further to 8,656.46 sq km on grounds such as bifurcation of villages and discrepancies in maps. The state had proposed to restrict the ESA area only to reserve forests, protected areas and world heritage areas.

An award-winning journalist with 14 years of experience, Nikhil Ghanekar is an Assistant Editor with the National Bureau [Government] of The Indian Express in New Delhi. He primarily covers environmental policy matters which involve tracking key decisions and inner workings of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change. He also covers the functioning of the National Green Tribunal and writes on the impact of environmental policies on wildlife conservation, forestry issues and climate change. Nikhil joined The Indian Express in 2024. Originally from Mumbai, he has worked in publications such as Tehelka, Hindustan Times, DNA Newspaper, News18 and Indiaspend. In the past 14 years, he has written on a range of subjects such as sports, current affairs, civic issues, city centric environment news, central government policies and politics. ... Read More

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement