Premium
This is an archive article published on August 13, 2024

Supreme Court closes contempt proceedings against Patanjali, warns against ‘any future intransigence’

The SC says Ramdev and Patanjali MD Acharya Balkrishna have made efforts ‘to take steps to make amends’ after the court rejected their first attempt to offer a qualified apology.

Patanjali founder Ramdev (Express File Photo by Rohit Jain Paras)Patanjali founder Ramdev (Express File Photo by Rohit Jain Paras)

The Supreme Court on Tuesday closed the contempt-of-court proceedings against yoga guru Ramdev and Patanjali MD Acharya Balkrishna in connection with a plea filed by the Indian Medical Association accusing them of making statements critical of modern medicine.

Accepting the unconditional apology tendered by them, a two-judge bench presided by Justice Hima Kohli noted that the “though” their “initial conduct…prior to their tendering apology showed that the same was in violation of the undertakings given to this court…”, after they tendered the apology, “efforts have been made by them to take steps to make amends”.

“On an overall conspectus of the facts of the present case and the sequence of events that have transpired from November 23 till May 2024, we are of the opinion that though the initial conduct of the proposed contemnors prior to their tendering apology to the court showed that the same was in violation of the undertakings given to this court, subsequently thereto, after they tendered, an unqualified apology to this court, efforts have been made by them to take steps to make amends. This was not only by expressing regret for their conduct on affidavit and in person, but also by taking steps to publicise the apology tendered by them through advertisements, published prominently in national and regional newspapers,” Justice Kohli said, reading out from the conclusions of the judgment.

Story continues below this ad

The bench further said, “No doubt the wisdom of tendering an unconditional apology dawned belatedly on the proposal contemnors after this court rejected the first attempt made by them to offer a qualified apology, but their subsequent conduct demonstrates that they have made sincere efforts to purge themselves. Given the attendant facts and circumstances of the case, and the efforts made by the proposed contemners to absolve themselves of acts that amounted to breach of undertaking given to their court, we are inclined to accept the apology tendered by them and close the matter.”

The bench added, “At the same time, they are cautioned to strictly abide by the terms of their undertakings. Any future intransigence on their part, whether by act deed or speech that could tantamount violating the order of the court, or dishonouring the terms of the undertakings shall be [dealt with] strictly, and the ensuring consequences could indeed be grave. In that eventuality, the sword of contempt that is now being returned to rest in its sheath shall be flourished as swiftly as this proceedings were originally initiated.”

The court had summoned Patanjali MD Acharya Balkrishna for allegedly flouting an undertaking given to the court. The court was upset over a press conference held by Ramdev on November 22, 2023, in Haridwar and an advertisement issued by the company on December 4, 2023, after it had assured the court on November 21, 2023, that it would not make any “casual statements claiming medicinal efficacy or against any system of medicine”.

Ananthakrishnan G. is a Senior Assistant Editor with The Indian Express. He has been in the field for over 23 years, kicking off his journalism career as a freelancer in the late nineties with bylines in The Hindu. A graduate in law, he practised in the District judiciary in Kerala for about two years before switching to journalism. His first permanent assignment was with The Press Trust of India in Delhi where he was assigned to cover the lower courts and various commissions of inquiry. He reported from the Delhi High Court and the Supreme Court of India during his first stint with The Indian Express in 2005-2006. Currently, in his second stint with The Indian Express, he reports from the Supreme Court and writes on topics related to law and the administration of justice. Legal reporting is his forte though he has extensive experience in political and community reporting too, having spent a decade as Kerala state correspondent, The Times of India and The Telegraph. He is a stickler for facts and has several impactful stories to his credit. ... Read More

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement