Why cracker ban only in elite Delhi, why not across India, protect industry workers: CJI

CJI B R Gavai, hearing an application by a group of firecracker manufacturers from Haryana, said that it will also have to consider the interests of the poor working in the firecracker industry.

‘Can’t have special treatment for Delhi’: SC says firecracker ban policy should apply across IndiaExplaining the rationale behind the ban, Senior Advocate Aparajitha Singh said that in winters, the situation in Delhi is such that people literally choke. (File Photo)

enquiring if the ban on firecrackers in Delhi NCR was because its people were “elite citizens of this country… entitled to pollution-free air”, Chief Justice of India B R Gavai said Friday that if polluted air had become “a national problem”, any policy to deal with it should be “on a pan-India basis”.

“If firecrackers are going to be banned, let them be banned throughout the country,” he said.

Hearing an application by a group of Haryana firecracker manufacturers seeking modification of the Supreme Court’s April 3, 2025 order completely banning the manufacturing, storage, sale and use of firecrackers in Delhi-NCR, CJI Gavai, heading a bench also comprising Justice Vinod Chandran, said,  “If citizens in NCR are entitled to pollution-free air, why not citizens in the rest of the country? Just because this is the capital city or the Supreme Court is situated in this area, it should have pollution-free air, but not the other citizens of the country.”

Story continues below this ad

Explaining the rationale behind the ban, Senior Advocate Aparajitha Singh, assisting the court as amicus curiae in the matter, said that in winters, the situation in Delhi is such that people literally choke.

The CJI said, “Last winter, I was in Amritsar on Gurpurab day, and I was told that the pollution in Amritsar was higher than in Delhi.”

Singh said it is a national problem. The CJI said if it is indeed a national problem, the response also has to be national. “Therefore, whatever policy has to be there, it has to be on a pan-India basis. We can’t have special treatment for Delhi because the people of Delhi are elite citizens of this country.”

Singh said, “There is this misunderstanding that air pollution affects the elite. The elite will take care of themselves. Deepawali, half of Delhi, goes outside. And they have air purifiers. But it’s the people on the street, the labourers who don’t have a choice… The poor and the impoverished.”

Story continues below this ad

The CJI said, “Therefore, we are saying that there has to be the same policy throughout the country. There can’t be a separate policy (for Delhi). If firecrackers are going to be banned, let them be banned throughout the country.”

“It’s also the poor who are dependent upon this industry. They have also to be looked into.”

The CJI said that when the court puts a ban on construction activities to combat air pollution, it is the workers who suffer. Singh, however, said that they are compensated by the state.

Appearing for the Centre, Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati pointed out that the National Environmental Engineering Research Institute (NEERI) has been working on green crackers. She said the Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM) will submit a report on the matter in consultation with NEERI.

Story continues below this ad

The bench said it will wait for the report: “Let the report come. We will examine.”

Appearing for the firecracker manufacturers, Senior Advocate K Parameshwar said that because of the complete ban, authorities have started to revoke all licences.

“We had licences up to 2028, 2030… It’s a tedious process to get an explosives licence. If you start cancelling all those licences,” he said.

The bench asked the authorities to maintain the status quo “as on today.”

Ananthakrishnan G. is a Senior Assistant Editor with The Indian Express. He has been in the field for over 23 years, kicking off his journalism career as a freelancer in the late nineties with bylines in The Hindu. A graduate in law, he practised in the District judiciary in Kerala for about two years before switching to journalism. His first permanent assignment was with The Press Trust of India in Delhi where he was assigned to cover the lower courts and various commissions of inquiry. He reported from the Delhi High Court and the Supreme Court of India during his first stint with The Indian Express in 2005-2006. Currently, in his second stint with The Indian Express, he reports from the Supreme Court and writes on topics related to law and the administration of justice. Legal reporting is his forte though he has extensive experience in political and community reporting too, having spent a decade as Kerala state correspondent, The Times of India and The Telegraph. He is a stickler for facts and has several impactful stories to his credit. ... Read More

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement

You May Like

Advertisement