Premium
This is an archive article published on September 13, 2023

Police disclosure must not result in media trial: SC directs MHA to prepare guidelines on briefings by cops

A three-judge bench presided by Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud said, “Media trials are liable to result in a deflection of the course of justice by impacting upon the evidence which would be adduced and its assessment by the adjudicating authorities.”

SCThe SC It asked the DGPs of all states to “communicate to the MHA” within one month “their suggestions for the preparation of appropriate guidelines”. (Express photo)
Listen to this article
Police disclosure must not result in media trial: SC directs MHA to prepare guidelines on briefings by cops
x
00:00
1x 1.5x 1.8x

Police briefings to the media about the investigation of crimes “must not result in a media trial so as to allow for the pre-judging of the guilt of the accused”, the Supreme Court cautioned Wednesday and directed the Union Ministry of Home Affairs to prepare within three months “a comprehensive manual on media briefings by police personnel”.

A three-judge bench presided by Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud said, “Media trials are liable to result in a deflection of the course of justice by impacting upon the evidence which would be adduced and its assessment by the adjudicating authorities.”

The bench also comprising Justices P S Narasimha and Manoj Misra noted that the existing guidelines on the subject were prepared by the Ministry of Home Affairs “over a decade ago on April 1, 2010” and added that “since then, with the upsurge in reporting on crimes not only in the print media but in the electronic and social media, it becomes extremely important that there should be there should be a standard operating procedure which balances out all the considerations….”.

Story continues below this ad

“There can be no denying the fact that the disclosure of an official version of the investigation would ensure against speculation on crime reporting, which may be of disservice both to the public interest involved and the interest of the accused, witnesses, prospective witnesses as well as victims and survivors of crime. There is in that sense a need to have a uniform policy which can be adopted for notifying nodal officers who would be available to share the official version of the stage of the investigation consistent with the need to ensure that the disclosure itself does not derail the course of the investigation,” said the bench.

The court said, “The nature of the disclosure cannot be uniform since it must depend upon the nature of the crime and the participating stakeholders, including the victims, witnesses and accused themselves. The age and gender of the accused as well as of the victims would have a significant bearing on the nature of the disclosure to be made as well. The guidelines must duly factor in the need to ensure that the disclosure must not result in a media trial so as to allow for the pre-judging of the guilt of the accused.”

It asked the DGPs of all states to “communicate to the MHA” within one month “their suggestions for the preparation of appropriate guidelines” after which the ministry “shall proceed to prepare the guidelines after considering the views which have been received from the DGP’s” and other stakeholders including the National Human Rights Commission.

The court was dealing with pleas which raised the issue of procedure to be followed by the police in investigating encounters and the propriety and procedure governing media briefings by police personnel where a criminal investigation is in progress. The first issue was dealt with and decided by the court in September 2014.

Ananthakrishnan G. is a Senior Assistant Editor with The Indian Express. He has been in the field for over 23 years, kicking off his journalism career as a freelancer in the late nineties with bylines in The Hindu. A graduate in law, he practised in the District judiciary in Kerala for about two years before switching to journalism. His first permanent assignment was with The Press Trust of India in Delhi where he was assigned to cover the lower courts and various commissions of inquiry. He reported from the Delhi High Court and the Supreme Court of India during his first stint with The Indian Express in 2005-2006. Currently, in his second stint with The Indian Express, he reports from the Supreme Court and writes on topics related to law and the administration of justice. Legal reporting is his forte though he has extensive experience in political and community reporting too, having spent a decade as Kerala state correspondent, The Times of India and The Telegraph. He is a stickler for facts and has several impactful stories to his credit. ... Read More

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement