Premium

Violates choice: SC asks Parliament to consider ban on child betrothals

The Supreme Court judgment came on a PIL by the Society for Enlightenment and Voluntary Action urging steps to check child marriages

supreme courtIn a trial run, the proceedings of all benches were streamed live on Friday. (File Photo)

Stating that marriages fixed in the minority of a child have the effect of violating their “free choice” and “childhood”, the Supreme Court on Friday asked Parliament to consider banning child betrothals by amending the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act (PCMA), 2006.

A three-judge bench presided by Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud said “international law such as the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) stipulates against betrothals of minors”.

“Marriages fixed in the minority of a child also have the effect of violating their rights to free choice, autonomy, agency and childhood. It takes away from them their choice of partner and life paths before they mature and form the ability to assert their agency,” said the bench, also comprising Justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra.

Story continues below this ad

“Parliament may consider outlawing child betrothals which can be used to evade penalty under PCMA. While a betrothed child may be a child in need of care and protection under the Juvenile Justice Act, the practice requires targeted remedies for its elimination,” it said.

Under PCMA, which considers child marriage a criminal offence, girls below the age of 18 and boys under 21 are deemed to be children.

The court also dealt with the interface between personal laws and prohibition of child marriage under the PCMA.

While saying that the Union Government had, in a note submitted after the judgment was reserved, requested the court to direct that PCMA prevails over personal law, it noted that The Prohibition of Child Marriage (Amendment) Bill 2021, which seeks to amend the PCMA to expressly state it will prevail over various personal laws, was introduced in Parliament on December 21, 2021 and referred to a Standing Committee. “The issue, therefore, is pending consideration before Parliament,” it said. The SC judgment came on a PIL by the Society for Enlightenment and Voluntary Action urging steps to check child marriages.

Story continues below this ad

On child marriages, the court said it “adversely affected” both sexes. “Girls who are married off early are not only denied their childhood but are also forced into social isolation…Boys who are married early are forced to take up more responsibilities and are pressured to play the role of a provider to the family, earlier in life,” it said.

The court noted that since the enactment of PCMA, “the prevalence of child marriages in India has halved… from 47% to 27% in 2015-16 and 23.3% in 2019-2021” but that despite the Centre’s efforts, there remains a gap in implementing specific, targeted measures focused solely on the prevention of child marriage.

“Existing schemes, while impactful, do not provide sufficient tools to tackle child marriage comprehensively…,” said the court.

Referring to data presented before it, the court said that it “reveals that a comprehensive, multifaceted approach involving training schemes, awareness programs, and financial incentives is essential for effectively combating child marriage. However, not all States have adopted this three-pronged strategy.”

Story continues below this ad

It said that “while these efforts contribute to raising awareness and promoting societal change, families facing financial hardships may still lean toward early marriage without economic support for educational or vocational opportunities. The absence of direct financial assistance may limit the reach and impact of otherwise well-designed training and awareness programs”.

Ananthakrishnan G. is a Senior Assistant Editor with The Indian Express. He has been in the field for over 23 years, kicking off his journalism career as a freelancer in the late nineties with bylines in The Hindu. A graduate in law, he practised in the District judiciary in Kerala for about two years before switching to journalism. His first permanent assignment was with The Press Trust of India in Delhi where he was assigned to cover the lower courts and various commissions of inquiry. He reported from the Delhi High Court and the Supreme Court of India during his first stint with The Indian Express in 2005-2006. Currently, in his second stint with The Indian Express, he reports from the Supreme Court and writes on topics related to law and the administration of justice. Legal reporting is his forte though he has extensive experience in political and community reporting too, having spent a decade as Kerala state correspondent, The Times of India and The Telegraph. He is a stickler for facts and has several impactful stories to his credit. ... Read More

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement