Madhya Pradesh High Court says burning of Sonam Raghuwanshi’s effigy on Dussehra is ‘wholly impermissible’

The court was hearing a plea by Sonam's mother seeking directions to stop a local Indore organisation from burning an effigy of her daughter

Sonam Raghuvanshi, the 24-year-old Indore resident arrested in connection with the murder of her husband Raja Raghuvanshi. (File Photo)Sonam Raghuvanshi, the 24-year-old Indore resident arrested in connection with the murder of her husband Raja Raghuvanshi. (File Photo)

The Madhya Pradesh High Court Friday directed the state administration to ensure that an effigy of Sonam Raghuwanshi — who’s accused of murdering her husband during their honeymoon in Meghalaya — is not burnt on Dussehra in place of Ravana.

The court was hearing a plea by Sonam’s mother seeking directions to stop a local Indore organisation from burning an effigy of her daughter or from undertaking any similar actions of public humiliation. She further sought directions to ensure no “unlawful or unconstitutional” actions were carried out against the petitioner and her family.

Remarking that such an act is “wholly impermissible” Justice Pranay Verma, said: “From the pamphlet and the other documents which have been brought by the petitioner on record it is evident that respondent No.6 proposes to burn effigy of daughter of the petitioner on Vijayadashmi on 02.10.2025 in place of effigy of Ravana. In case the same is correct and respondent No.6 intends to do so then the same would be wholly impermissible in a democratic country like India.”

Story continues below this ad

The Bench went on to say: “Even if the daughter of the petitioner is an accused in a criminal case and whatsoever may be the grievance of respondent against her and her family members it cannot be permitted to resort to such effigy burning which would certainly violate the fundamental rights of the petitioner, her daughter as well as his entire family. Such action on part of respondent No.6 or anyone else cannot be permitted.”

The court directed state authorities to ensure that nobody “burns the effigy of the petitioner’s daughter or any other individual in place of the effigy of Ravana”.

Sonam’s mother contended that such actions of the organisation were against “all canons of law” and were “gross violation of the fundamental rights” of the petitioner and her family. It was asserted that “such an act cannot be permitted to take place which shall tarnish the image of the petitioner and his family permanently”.

 

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement