Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram
Salman Khan hit-and-run case verdict: Probe was conducted in a faulty manner, says Bombay HC
The prosecution failed to establish its case against Salman Khan on all charges, said the high court.

Acquitting actor Salman Khan in the 2002 hit-and-run case, the Bombay High Court said the prosecution failed to establish its case against Salman Khan on all charges. On September 28, 2002, Salman’s car had rammed into a bakery shop in suburban Bandra. One person was killed and four others were injured in the mishap.
Must Read: Ravindra Patil a ‘wholly unreliable’ witness, says HC
Here is what the Bombay High Court said while passing the Salman Khan verdict:
# The trial court’s verdict is quashed and set aside. Salman is acquitted of all charges.
# The prosecution failed to establish its case against the appellant accused (Salman) on all charges.
# The burden is on the prosecution to establish the guilt of the accused and this needs to be done beyond reasonable doubt.
# There are various shortcomings by the prosecution like not recording evidence of necessary and important witnesses and omissions and contradictions in the evidence of injured witnesses, which definitely create a doubt about the involvement of Salman for offences for which he has been charged. On the basis of such evidence, Salman cannot be convicted.
# The investigation was conducted in a faulty manner with many loose ends and as such benefit of this had to be given in favour of the accused.
# On the main aspects as to driving and drunkenness, the prosecution has not brought any material evidence which spells out the offence of the accused.
# The trial court erred in accepting bills (of Rain Bar and Restaurant where Salman had gone before the mishap) without a panchnama.
All you need to know about Salman Khan
With PTI inputs