Journalism of Courage
Premium

Contract ended, China firm claims damages, Indian Railways replies with counter

The company, China Railway Signalling and Communication (CRSC) Research and Design Institute, recently instituted arbitration under International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) rules in Singapore.

Chinese Railway, China Railway Signalling and Communication, International Chamber of Commerce, Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India Limited (DFCCIL), Uttar Pradesh, Indian Express, India news, current affairs, Indian Express News Service, Express News Service, Express News, Indian Express India NewsPlaying hardball, the Indian side — the Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India Limited (DFCCIL), under the Railways — has issued a counter-claim of Rs 71 crore on the Chinese major. The matter is headed for a showdown in the international tribunal, sources in the Railways said.
Advertisement

Two years after the Railways terminated a Rs 471-crore contract of the Chinese Railway’s signalling and telecom arm for its works in Uttar Pradesh, the Chinese firm has locked Indian Railways in international dispute and claimed Rs 279 crore compensation.

The company, China Railway Signalling and Communication (CRSC) Research and Design Institute, recently instituted arbitration under International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) rules in Singapore.

Playing hardball, the Indian side — the Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India Limited (DFCCIL), under the Railways — has issued a counter-claim of Rs 71 crore on the Chinese major. The matter is headed for a showdown in the international tribunal, sources in the Railways said.

In 2020, DFCCIL terminated CRSC’s contract for installation signalling and telecom systems on the 417-km stretch between Kanpur and Mughalsarai (now Deen Dayal Upadhyay) stations in UP for the Eastern Dedicated Freight Corridor.

The contract was terminated at the peak of the border dispute between the neighbours in Ladakh. The DFCCIL had cited non-performance by the contractor as the reason behind the move.

The Indian Express had first reported on the termination of the contract in 2020.

The Chinese company had dragged the matter to Delhi High Court at the time, but to no avail.

Story continues below this ad

It has now raised claims regarding works it affirms to have executed under the contract but was not paid for; return of its forfeited bank guarantee; interest on various forfeited amounts; and claims for various overheads and contractual deployment. The Chinese company contends that termination of the contract was illegal, as the Indian side did not comply with the procedure set out for termination in the contract.

In response, DFCCIL has raised a counter-claim on the basis of recovery of mobilisation advance; retention money and balance under the termination clauses, apart from regularisation of forfeiture of the bank guarantee, officials told The Indian Express.

Faced with claims and counter-claims, the international tribunal has called for various submissions, which are “in the process of being complied with by the parties as per procedural orders”, a senior official said.

One of the reasons why the contract was terminated was that the Chinese side was “reluctant to furnish technical documents such as logic design of electronic interlocking,” this official said.

Story continues below this ad

The Railways has said that the Chinese company did not do any work, and even after four years made only around 20 per cent progress.

Asked about the progress of the contract now, a DFCCIL official said that the balance work was re-tendered and is progressing under a different contractor.

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Tags:
  • China Express Premium Indian Railways Uttar Pradesh
Edition
Install the Express App for
a better experience
Featured
Trending Topics
News
Multimedia
Follow Us
EXPRESS PREMIUMWhy India shouldn't be worried by Saudi-Pak deal
X