skip to content
Advertisement
Premium

Sandeep Reddy Vanga says he’s not violent in real life because we live in a democracy: ‘If it were the Stone Age…’

While Sandeep Reddy Vanga recently asserted that he is not a violent person in real life, he suggested that this is largely because of the democratic system we live in, implying that without it, people might be far more aggressive.

While Sandeep Reddy Vanga recently asserted that he is not a violent person in real life, he suggested that this is largely because of the democratic system we live in, implying that without it, people might be far more aggressive.Sandeep Reddy Vanga helmed Arjun Reddy, its Hindi remake Kabir Singh, and Animal. (Credit: Instagram/@sandeepreddy.vanga)

Although he has directed only three films so far — Arjun Reddy (2017), its Hindi remake Kabir Singh (2019), and Animal (2023) — Sandeep Reddy Vanga is one of India’s most controversial filmmakers at the moment, with his movies frequently facing criticisms for glorifying violence and normalising misogyny. While Vanga recently asserted that he is not a violent person in real life, he suggested that this is largely because of the democratic system we live in, implying that without it, people might be far more aggressive.

When asked whether he shares the violent traits of his protagonists, Vanga told Komal Nahta on his YouTube show Game Changers: “I cannot do that in a democracy. Otherwise (if not for democracy), obviously; because the person opposite us would also do the same. If it were the Stone Age, he would do something, and you would react accordingly, right?”

Also Read | Sandeep Reddy Vanga recalls an IAS officer’s reaction to Animal: ‘He sounded like I committed some crime’

Story continues below this ad

Surprisingly, Vanga expressed support for censorship in filmmaking. When asked if his films would have been more violent without censorship, he responded that nearly everything he had filmed made it to the final cut. “Whatever I shot was pretty much there in the movie. A few words were muted. However, had censorship not been there, maybe the movie would have had more explicit language.”

He further maintained that film certification and censorship should be handled by retired filmmakers who understand the nuances of storytelling, rather than by those people who might cut scenes without proper context. “I feel censorship should be controlled by senior, retired directors, not by people who don’t understand filmmaking. It would be easier to reason with them because an ex-filmmaker would understand more. I feel the intention should be clearly judged more than talking about just one scene.”

ICYMI | Mika wanted Gauri Khan to design his 99th house, Shah Rukh Khan joked ‘lootegi tujhe, mehenga karegi’

Sandeep Reddy Vanga also emphasised that while censorship is necessary, there should be more flexibility. “There should be censorship, otherwise people would shoot anything and show it to audiences,” he said, while advocating for a more flexible system. “Hollywood has censorship too. What you can do, however, is to categorise films appropriately, such as R-rated, instead of refusing certificates or chopping a film,” Vanga added.

Story continues below this ad

He, nonetheless, acknowledged that an “A” certificate can significantly impact a film’s commercial success. “Of course, we can’t manipulate to get a U/A. I understand Animal receiving an ‘A’ certificate, but Kabir Singh shouldn’t have. We didn’t contest it because Arjun Reddy had also been given an ‘A’. Though I was upset then, the censor officer told me not to worry and even predicted that the movie would be a success.”

Click here to follow Screen Digital on YouTube and stay updated with the latest from the world of cinema.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement